And, no offense, but it failed to demonstrate any clear superiority (or in fact, any superiority at all). The translation was flawed, and was obscured by some synth washes that weren't really idiomatic to a bossa... not to mention, it did little in the way of changes (surely you know more than the one chord!) to illustrate how well it handles bass inversion (oops! forgot... it won't even do that, will it?), late chord entry, fills etc..

And, I'm sorry, but posting a translation of a Roland style with few chords isn't exactly playing us YOUR music, is it? That's all we have ever wanted. Many of us here post our own stuff, whether to illustrate points or for something like the SZ eJam (didn't notice a single MS entry), or just to go 'Look at what my arranger and I did!' for the sheer joy of it. Where is the joy of the MS user? For the most part, silent...

Unless you count interminable posting about how much better THEIR keyboard is to anything else. Sorry, but that doesn't count. Music counts. I don't care about HDMI, or motherboards, or I/O specs. I care about MUSIC. Sometimes, I wonder whether MS users do, at all...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!