maybe we are just not speaking the same language.

The melodyne clip showed single audio notes being analysed and strecthed which i know the qranger can do .The difference to what i want to see demonstrated is that the audio is monophonic. The entire audio is one note to the melodyme. and the Melodyme can play chords from that one note. There is no confusion there . What i want is proof that the Qranger can transpose audio chords into different audio chords correctly. The Melodyme cannot do that.

I saw the you tube clip. Can you tell me what chords you were playing because it looked to me like you were playing basic major and maybe minor triads. Although i heard the pitch change i could not tell if you had changed chord type or what chords you played in terms of their complexity. I know the Qranger was following the bottom note on the keyboard but i could not tell if it followed the chord.

For example you moved from a c major to an E flat major so the pitch moved from the C to E but i could not tell from the clip if you played a different chord type. In the example the audio clip where they sang the phrase " go waste no time following you no more" when you changed chord the harmonies shifted but the entire harmony stretched in unison. Meaning the intervals or the notes were the same distance apart. I could not tell if the voices reflected the chord type because all you used were (from what i could see ) were basic triads which i know the Qranger can do.

But i asked about complex chords.

What would have been a good example is if you kept the same key say C but played a minor chord and then a major chord and then say an 9th or 13th or diminished or flattened 6th all in the same key to the same piece of audio,(not the entire track, just an 8 bar loop because the entire track had changed some chords itself and it got confusing) )to see how that affected the harmonies and whether they moved uniformly or in accordance with the actual chord type.

That popular Guitar riff that you punched in from time to time before you started the next piece of music was not in the same key as the main body of the music. What was going on there ? You need to demonstrate the different types of chord IN THE SAME KEY. That would show clearly whether the audio could adapt to the type of chord NOT THE PITCH OF THE CHORD.

I hope i havent confused you. I am not trying to be dificult. I just want to understand and be clear what this thing can do because if it is actually able to do what you say it can then we really do have t
an amazing additional feature on an arranger that should be the main selling point of the MS. The whole problem with Styles would be redundant.




[This message has been edited by spalding1968 (edited 06-11-2009).]