One thing a lot of persons are forgetting about the MS is that whether a style sounds better is very subjective.

James could and probably will post examples of good converted styles on the MS but the detractors will still find that it is not to their liking.
And rightfully so. That’s why some have Yamahas, Roland Ketrons and Korgs.

After all, isn’t that a lot of the discussions hear on SZ?
Some people think Ketron styles are better than Yamaha. Some think Roland styles are better than Korg.

So why does any one think that one demo of the MS showing off a converted style would be pleasing to a Roland, Yamaha or Ketron lover?

The real advantage of the MS is that it allows the user to get a number of styles ready for that particular person’s gig types.

It is not as some people would like to think about substituting sounds. It is about customizing a style to your playing ability and having your own individuality.

You like to use a certain VST in your recordings? Well with the MS you can take that VST on your gigs and include it in a style and keep your signature sound.

If a real serious gigging is not taking time to modify and tweak styles to his playing ability and to his individuality, then that person is probably not as serious and probably not realizing his full potential.
Even the home players of the PSR 910 do the work and tweak their styles.