ensnare you and James its my fault , i apologise ,i did not make myself clear . I meant as an arranger. I took it for granted that this was what we were talking about as i have not nor am i questioning the MS as a workstation. I have heard great sequenced tracks on a casio keyvboards but when you play a style suddenly you realise you are playing a casio so sequnced tracks dont matter to me. Just for clarity i will say it again. I am sure the MS works like a workstation well. What concerns me is why is it when the one example i have ever asked for which is a demo of the MS playing kick ass arranger styles BETTER THAN A CLOSED SYSTEM ARRANGER , all i get is links to sequences or software from companies that are not even remotely connected with the Mediastation or just plain sequenced music ??? Where are the arranger style demos ??????????? The more the question gets avoided or ignored the more i smell a rat ..... Ensnare you, you have an MS could you send me a demo of the MS using a style of your choice that as far as you are concerned is better than the Closed keyboard it was copied from and do an AB side by side test? This is not rocket science or at least it should not be according to the claims of MS users like good your good self.

[This message has been edited by spalding1968 (edited 04-23-2010).]