Guys...let's be honest here. This is a (as the title infers) a general arranger forum. Where one can visit to get unbiased reviews of all brands of arrangers. Lord knows that everyone of the manufactures have taken their lumps on this forum. Some more than others. This review of The MZ-X500 is extremely appropriate for this forum as it separates company hype from real world experience. I for one am grateful for the reviews posted here as it can only assist the buyer become better informed. Thanks Linda and Squeak
jingleman
I dont think blowing up a minor issue all over the internet is honest, espescially since Casio allready said its going to be taken care off....
There is a great review of the Mz-x out on this forum by squeak, that he upgraded two times with new information.... And then he suddenly starts a whole new post blowing a minor issue out of proportions... While allready announced on the facebookgroup (where he posted this to) that the issue is going to be taken care off...
Why not add this remark to his grand review of the MZ-x in another post, where it belongs, and where it would have fit well in contrast to all the highlights of this keyboard... Instead of pulling a single negative comment out of proportions..
I am all for people posting opinions and reviews on the website... I only said that it not entirely fair to Casio to draw all attention to a single negative point... Thats my opinion, and thats whats it is... My opinion.
I will give you an example, of where this kind of posting in the end leads to, the Orriginal Korg Kronos had a small issue with its keybed in the first 3 months after release, yet still every week we still get questions on the Kronos keybed, if it is really as problematic as they have read in those 4 year old posts...
This is how the interwebs work, and this negativity will keep surrounding a certain issue long after it has been resolved....