|
|
|
|
|
|
#369399 - 07/21/13 11:34 AM
Re: What Korg has to do to get me back ...
[Re: Uncle Dave]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/31/06
Posts: 3354
Loc: The World
|
UD, what midi transmit did you have the upper set to, and want was the receive channel on the Harm-M? Also you must set the upper sections to "both" under style play Track Controls. Factory default is internal only. If you are not getting the correct harmony on the M, it is getting no midi note data (as determined by the tiny flashing LED next to the input knob). My guess is the PA was not set to be transmitting there are two places it needs to be set, the Track Controls as above and in the Global section. Further it needs to be set for BOTH style mode, and for song mode. As each mode can have a different method. EG for style you may have the upper to external and in song mode have it set to internal. What I used to do was actually drive the Harm M from Upper 3, with no PA sound patch and the volume at 0. As the Harm M also responds to patch changes, you can also set (via MSB/LSB and Patch #) this as the Upper 3 patch so that when the song/style is loaded it sends the patch set for upper 3 to the Harm M (assuming it is saved to the STS of course, and uppper 3 is set to either external or both. I just had it set to external. Dennis PS: I suspect even more that one of the two section setups has not been done correctly if the Harm M responds well from the arranger section, which by OS default is set to transmit. The Harm M by default is set to receive on channel 1, however it can bet set to any channel. That is another thing to check - the receiving channel on the Harm M (IIRC, the M does not have Midi OMNI Rx mode) as it may have inadvertently been set to something other than the channel (I assume you are using Upper 1?) assigned to upper 1, which means it is getting note data, just not the correct data
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#369400 - 07/21/13 11:53 AM
Re: What Korg has to do to get me back ...
[Re: Saswick]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1159
Loc: Oradea, RO
|
I was going to change my Pa600 and my VLT 1 for the Pa900 but was disappointed that the VH in the Pa900 was the old version not the one from the Pa3x so I opted for above set up, a few more cables but it works very well.
Regards
Col Not that I don't believe that, but is there a documented prove that the harmonizer is the old generation? For sure it's not the full flagged vocalist that pa3x has, but Pa900 could very well be a simpler version, less voices, less effects, but still same quality. Is there a solid argument against this possibility other than assumtion?
_________________________
Yamaha S770, Studio One 3, EMU 0404USB, ESI, ATH, Dell. And others.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#369404 - 07/21/13 05:15 PM
Re: What Korg has to do to get me back ...
[Re: Uncle Dave]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15563
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
For the PSR-S950 and all other Yamaha keyboards, the keyboard's MIDI must be set to "KBD & Style" which is accessed via Function/MIDI. This allows the Harmony-M to recognize all chords played on the keyboard. Now, if UD is not using the lower (style) to trigger the Harmony-M, then in the Mic setting section, the Vocal Harmony control under the KBD column must be set to Upper in order to send the correct MIDI information to the Harmony-M. If I recall correctly, UD always triggers his vocal harmonies with his right hand chording. Cheers, Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#369409 - 07/21/13 11:03 PM
Re: What Korg has to do to get me back ...
[Re: adimatis]
|
Member
Registered: 01/05/01
Posts: 875
Loc: Garstang, Preston, Lancashire,...
|
I was going to change my Pa600 and my VLT 1 for the Pa900 but was disappointed that the VH in the Pa900 was the old version not the one from the Pa3x so I opted for above set up, a few more cables but it works very well.
Regards
Col Not that I don't believe that, but is there a documented prove that the harmonizer is the old generation? For sure it's not the full flagged vocalist that pa3x has, but Pa900 could very well be a simpler version, less voices, less effects, but still same quality. Is there a solid argument against this possibility other than assumtion? Check the manual for both keyboards, the VH in the Pa900 is exactly the same as the Pa800/Pa2x. Regards Col
Edited by Saswick (07/21/13 11:04 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|