Originally Posted By Diki
Sorry Groovyband, but you need to be more accurate when trying to put a competitor’s product down.


I have only stated some facts, and it seems that they were fairly accurate since nobody, not even the Ketron guys, corrected me. Where informations were missing I asked for clarifications, that for most part never came, probably because being explicit about the likely limitations would have undermined the product.


Originally Posted By Diki

The Ketron is quite capable of changing tempo on the audio loop. Not perhaps as much as a MIDI only arranger, but AJ and Sokratis are correct in saying tempo is adjustable.


Sure it can be adjusted. After all you can listen to a 33 rpm record to 45 rpm, or you can load in a DAW a 44.1 kHz sample rate wave and replay it pretending it is 96 kHz. We all know how the result will look like, and Sokratis too aknowledged this obvious fact. When I asked what happened when changing the tempo from 50 to 150 bpm I already knew the answer. And Ketron too was well aware.
How much degradation you are willing to accept is a personal matter of taste. Everybody has its own.


Originally Posted By Diki

And while 4 effect seems a bit light, it was all a PA4X had until the new model. And more than a PSRS950. So, you want to make disparaging comparisons, there’s no need to use a decades old model. The new Ketron’s MIDI arranger is comparable to arrangers only a year or two old.


The PSR950 has 4 insert DSPs (and 1 of them can also be used as 3rd send), as it had the PSR 1500 in 2004. The fact that many arrangers, including the upcoming Ketron flagship, cannot do better than a 20 years old mid level machine, or a today’s entry level machine (SX 600), is a fact that I already pointed out. Thank you for stating it once again (including also other aspects such us the number of intros, endings, variations).



Originally Posted By Diki

I would prefer if acknowledged vendors don’t spam each other’s threads, you certainly don’t want AJ coming over to your threads and pointing out the advantages their new arranger may have over your product. Let’s keep it civil.

Thank you.


I spammed nobody. I only stated facts nobody argued, asked polite questions and clarifications (for the most part ignored), and posted only 3 times (with short and coincise posts). Additionally I only mentioned our product once, with 3 words at the end of the last post in 5th page, and did NOT compare it with Ketron products.
If you read again the whole thread you will notice that YOU posted many more times constantly criticizing the Ketron.


... see the mote in one's brother's eye but not the beam in one's own
_________________________
Groovyband Live! - Realtime Arranger Software