 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#362388 - 03/01/13 08:18 PM
Re: KORG VS YAMAHA in Middle range Keyboards
[Re: KORG80]
|
Member
Registered: 08/24/04
Posts: 667
Loc: City of Angels in the golden s...
|
My music store brought in a Yamaha PSR S950 and I tried it today and was impressed by the sound quality and excellent guitar sounds. Not so impressed with the keyboard action. Pretty chintzy for a $2000 instrument. Does anyone have feedback on the vocal harmonizer onboard the PSR S950? I plan to go back to the store with my headset mike and check for myself but would appreciate hearing from any of you who use this keyboard THANKS!
God Bless, Don
Psr s950's VH 2 is not as good as Helicon is PA 800. If you don't need , audio styles,mp3 playback, extra SA sounds and Built in VH (since you already have digitech) , S750 ( S910 in a box minus VH and Mp 3 playback) can be a good value.All styles upto 910 will be compatible). Styles wise especially if you play US/UK (western music ),you can find thousands of styles and afew good hundreds. Limitation of Korg will appear afew weeks after you purchased the KB especially for a arranger player.great drums/pad/seq/song book etc. but like most Korg arranger owners (non Balkan or middle eastern, style playing players, not Smf / sequencing / home studio musicians) style hunting will end in disappointment (just check Korg forums and talk to owners) . Chord triggering is also smoother in Yamaha and slash chords/voicing sound more natural without in your face issues. Simple bass lines are the key and sometimes Korg doesn't get it. Yamaha has the more styles avail than other manufactures combined.(the whole Pa 80 style sets in freely avail , they even have for ix300 (I loved x3 the compact size and keys with after touch ) if I'm not mistaken. In other words , ( if you want to invest in an arranger for long term use) ,there are converted styles from ALL manufacturers that are workable for Yamaha. Not the other way around (mainly for mega voice mappings). Yamaha do suck in keys( bad for inspiration),hardware and drums.it compensate in good usable sounds and more importantly vast styles avalibility for solo players for fast song creation ( if you don't want to rely only on SMFs). To the original Q, if you can't afford a tyros, get a 750 , use your digitech and wait for the next big thing with more money in the pocket while making music and create songs faster. Hope this helps . I see this as IOS(Yamaha ) vs Android(korg and others). More edit/functionality in Android but lack of apps and third party support compared to IOS.
Edited by jamman (03/01/13 08:48 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#362458 - 03/02/13 10:32 PM
Re: KORG VS YAMAHA in Middle range Keyboards
[Re: hakurup]
|
Member
Registered: 08/24/04
Posts: 667
Loc: City of Angels in the golden s...
|
Fully agree to member Jamman's post. Spot on when he says that PSR 750 will fulfill the bare needs till enough coins are in the pocket for a Tyros. BTW, looking at the trend of Yamaha with the PSR 750 / 950 combination; and taking a cue from the Roland Jupiter 80/50; can we now get to see a "Mini-Tyros" - something like the Jupiter 50 is to the Jupiter 80? 950 already is a mini tyros with not so great hardware . Most of the Korg arranger players are one or more of the following. Must choose a Kb that does all for budget reasons( a kb with good sequencer ,good sound editing,good sound competability ( Pa50 can load Triton programs-of course minus EFX),a kb that is good enough for live band play, good hardware Their gigs are mainly SMF playback and occasional arranger work/ they use arranger mainly as a drum machine with live left hand bass and right had chording They play east euro or mid east music Until Pa3x us/uk/Asia maket is ruled by psr/tyros.(more 4/4 styles than 9/8s- see below).rememer 2 fills with problematic fills in some styles? EU/ Balkan and mid east (they even have their Country specific models as you know since distributors in those countries can prebuy or order in significant numbers (kb and expensive accessories such as Roms) are dominated by korg and Roland (was).they don't even know TOTL/MOTL Yamaha arrangers .yamaha did unsuccessful attempts to break in to the maket with A series yet sound wise and support wise couldn't match Korg. Like I previously said the game changed in the west after affortable Psr 2000 and upward. It's great that Korg is doing with 600. Western 3rd party support will grow eventually due to fact that many home players can afford the very capable KB with pro features and on board deep sound editing / style creation to seperate individual drum sound mix (level and efx send)even in arranger mode( people with more time to make styles/conversions , etc the same mentality happened to Psr since early 2000 in Us/uk). I love both KBs.each of them have unique strengths and weaknesses.bur for US/UK mainly 4/4 singer songwriter gigger gtr player musicians - for now Yamaha is the way for the reasons (especially your set is mainly arranger mode ). Typing from my phone. Sorry for my spelling , gentlemen.
Edited by jamman (03/02/13 10:52 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|