Good points, Linda. The quality of a product and the market's perception of it two different things. We all know Casio has an image problem, but you see the MZ-2000 for what it can do for you. The Casio MZ-2000 has features not found on other arrangers and features found only on more expensive arrangers. It competes well on the merits against other arrangers in its price range. If it had vocal harmony and mass storage, it could compete at the high end. There is certainly nothing about Casio that would suggest they could not compete at the high end if and when they chose to. The lack of Casio styles on the Web is due primarily to the recency with which Casios have accommodated custom styles and the fact that they are not badly needed since abundantly available Roland styles can be used.