Originally Posted By: ianmcnll
I'd rather have the full MIDI based styles than either full audio (Ketron) or audio drums (Yamaha).

These two latter style types are still too restrictive (especially Yamaha) to be of any real use to someone like me who does a lot of editing.

The Ketron are obviously more flexible, but the fact that they don't use all audio parts for all possible chords is not acceptable to me.

With Yamaha, it is not possible to share edited audio drum styles, even with those with the same instrument...big drawback.

So, I'll stick with an instrument that uses only MIDI based styles, thank you very much, until the technology comes along to overcome these non-acceptable (to me) disadvantages.

Ian


I would rather have both... Sometimes guitartracks add things which arent possible yet with todays midi technollogy... However there are vsts allready that come really really close..

But indeed most of the times espescially with advanced chords midi is much more dynamic..

And while you can get a lot of audio stuff from huge libraries of audio loops, i agree that midi is so much more edditable..


Almost allways having more options allows for better endresults..


Both are not mutually exclusive, and you dont have to choose, you can have both, but if i had to choose based on current technollogy, i agree that i would choose midi based styles..
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Roland Jupiter 80, Ipad pro.

http://keyszone.boards.net