Originally posted by Bill in Dayton:
Ian-I'm surprised at your comment that you don't see a difference in set up/tear down times between the L1 and a conventional PA. I'm curious how this can be.
Bill,
I think you might have misunderstood my post.
The setup time is
about the same because I am using
two complete L1 systems...I was using two powered monitors.
The two powered monitors, which only weigh 25 lbs each, were a tad faster to set up, but not by much, as I still had to assemble the stands I use to bring them up to ear level.
I don't use a mixer with either system....just line outs from the keyboard....I use the keyboard's internal mixer.
The Bose works "okay" or adequately, using a single system, but I do find a
dramatic difference when using two in stereo.
The stereo effect sweet spot is also hugely increased, and, to my ears, seems to be present nearly every where in the room.
I'm not one to waste money, and if the two Bose systems did not provide such a substantial improvement over one, I wouldn't have invested the money.
I did extensive testing, both with one and two Bose systems, before I made my decision, and it is a choice I do not regret for one second.
I now have a terrific system that is stereo, and provides ideal coverage.
Mind you, I still use my Yamaha powered monitors for some restaurant work, where a drop off of sound is more beneficial than complete coverage in every nook and cranny.
The Bose L1 in mono was unacceptable to me as I really missed having stereo sound, especially for effects like rotary speaker, delays, and choruses.
Ian
[This message has been edited by ianmcnll (edited 05-14-2009).]