Originally posted by Synthman:
Hi again
Hey guys. Don't you read what I write before you hurry to the keyboard and answear the topics?????
My hole intension with my topics is to clear up: What do we do, if no style companies sees a business in making styles and midifiles. I think it's only maybe 5% of the users of arranger keyboards who's capable to make there own styles or midifiles from scratch.
This is the issue in this discussion.
And further more there is the discussion of copyrights.
I see it straight from a performers viewpoint.
Regards
Synthman
But don’t you have to answer the question whether or not the midi file makers and style makers have copyright in the work before you can talk about rightful compensation?
I would think that style makers, if they create a work that does not substantially sound like another song, they have the copyright to that new creation in a style. If that style is viewed as a new original work, then they would have the right to control modification of the work, any derivatives of the work and distribution of the work.
I would agree that the sheering of styles made by an independent style maker will hurt the individual style maker and probably put them out of business. However, I don’t think it will hurt the manufacturers as much because as part of the keyboard the majority of people want internal styles.
As much as I would not mine an arranger without any preset styles, I don’t think that will happen because the majority of the arranger market wants every thing done for them already. So a keyboard manufacturer would not make a keyboard without styles because they would not sell.
From a performer’s viewpoint, it is better when the performer creates the style because it will fit the playing style of the performer and will give an individual twist to the style.