Hi Scott,
...I had hoped for better than 384 TPQN (aka: ppq)
Well, at 1.3ms per pulse, let me say that 384ppq is not exactly "low resolution"... We can improve on that, but is it worth the additional computation resources needed?
As for your other question, we usually don't publish this kind of information, since it has very little relevance on the quality and usability of the instrument.
This same philosophy applies to the PCM ROM memory. More megabytes does not always mean a higher quality. Furthermore, some of our competitors like to play with numbers, for example publishing measurements in Megabits, instead of MegaBytes, and we don't like this kind of PR tricks. So, we prefer our potential customers decide with their ears, instead of doing some kind of math.
Best regards,
Paolo