When playing the🎼Genos, the instrument is very forgiving when you make small mistales, somehow they are way less audible then on the Roland. When playing the Jupiter 80 it feels like every little mistake you make is directly audible.

I think i know why this is..
I guess its probably because the Roland somehow is much more dynamic..


Whats your experience?
Which do you prefer?

When using auto accompaniment, my Ketron Audya does like any “ slips” of the fingered, meaning you need to play very accurate for best results. My Kong Havian and Yamaha 950 are much more forgiving, which I prefer, because nobody is perfect!

Its not so much the auto accompaniment...

But more the advanced super natural voices of the Roland, that are much harder and take more time to get good results then Yamaha’s sa2 voices ...

I feel it playing the piano on my Juno DS. While it feels much more like playing an actual piano than when I play PSR-S950, there's some sort of a "gap" between multisamples and it's easy to play a note too loud. It made me better understand why music teachers are often against any sort of digital pianos.

Nevertheless, the piano on my PSR now sounds too "thin" to me, although I used to like it. I'm fine now playing anything but piano on PSR and playing pianos on Juno.

Paul, you might try changing your chord mode to 'Fingered 2', or if you use easy chords, then 'Easy 1.' These latter modes require releasing all the keys and re-pressing before a different chord is acknowledged. It's not as quick, but in your case you might find it more positive. HTH!

One trick that I've used with the style voices, is to lengthen the attack or add a slight initial delay. This gives you a few milliseconds to get all the notes down before they start sounding. I also sometimes reduce cutoff (brightness) and resonance, to make the sound "darker." As some of you have already stated, the play is less punchy and expressive. For accompaniment I find this ok, it really depends on what you're trying to do.

Thanks for the tip Ted!