  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
#349647 - 08/24/12 01:04 PM
 
So, I bought a Roland BA-330 Personal PA...
 | 
 
 
 
Senior Member
 
 
 
Registered:  03/21/03
 
Posts: 3748
 
Loc:  Motown
 | 
...and to my surpeise it really kicks a$$.  I was able to get myself an open-box unit for $399; it's in brand new condition with the warranty and all.  Not surprisingly, the unit is quite portable AND built like a tank.
  Sonically, it's a very good sounding piece of equipment.  I plugged my s910 into it in stereo, something I never do with my Compact.  I can't say that I noticed anything different in that category, but then again I had the amp set about 10ft to my left side.  What I did notice was that the keyboards were a bit clearer and had a little more definition than I hear with the Bose.  I decided to run my mic directly into the Roland instead of the keyboard.  I liked what I heard most of the time.
  I'm pretty much judging the BA-330 against my L1 Compact.  Let me say that I 'think' I still prefer the Bose.  Why?  Sound dispersion is supeior in the Compact.  The very first comment I heard today was from some crochety old woman who said, loud enough to be heard, "this is too loud."  Mind you, if I heard that comment about my Bose with the volumes set the way I had them today, I'd say it was only her crabbiness.  But because I had a new setup, I was a bit more cautious.
  I do have to say that the Roland has that traditional out front sound, and it sounds terrific, but it's not a Bose sound.  I think the sound quality is very close, but again I think the Bose disperses the sound better while the Roland has an excellent traditional PA sound. I feel I need to be more cautious when setting the dials for the Ba-330 so I don't run into chippiness or boominess, problems I rarely run ito with the Compact.
  In all, I'm much impressed with BA-330.  I ran it very conservatively and got a much better than expected sound.  It's way better than the CM-30s or the PW-50's I have used - AND, it's one unit (which I like).  For $400-600, this is a no brainer for anyone who plays small rooms.  And judging from Frankieve's HK-Nano review, this is still the better bang for the buck.  I look forward to using it again and fine tuning the sound to make it even better.  
  Ps- I didn't really buy this unit to replace my Bose Compact.  I actually bought it as a back up and as something to keep on hand at church for those rare moments when I need a small, versatile amp.  But now the BA-330's sound has given me pause. I now have the dilema of which small PA to use.  Luckily, I can't go wrong with either choice.  
  Edited by cassp (08/24/12 01:34 PM) Edit Reason: accuracy check
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
  |   
 | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
#349666 - 08/24/12 08:00 PM
 
Re: So, I bought a Roland BA-330 Personal PA...
[Re: cassp]
 | 
 
 
 
Senior Member
 
 
 
Registered:  03/21/03
 
Posts: 3748
 
Loc:  Motown
 | 
Paul, I think I could have easily used it as a personal monitor with my sax, guitar, keyboard trio.  The BA is surprisingly strong (loud) for being 30 watts.  Today's technology produces some exciting noise. I considered a powered 12" two-way, but would probably have to add a mixer (for OMB work).  As Donny said, the unit is very versatile: stereo, 4(6) channels with reverb/delay, lots of in/outs AND all in a single unit weighing under 30 lbs.  The fact that it angles up easily or can be mounted on a speaker pole makes it all the more versatile.  The best advice I can give is to compare it yourself, if you can.  I bought mine sight unseen based on SZ and other reviews only, but then again my needs are somewhat different than yours. 1) It is a good sounding, strong and versatile unit.  2) It is not made for large spaces, but can be linked to other equipment easily.  Good luck. 
 
 |  
| 
Top
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
  |   
 | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
 
 
	
 |  
 
 |