|
|
|
|
|
|
#244403 - 10/08/08 12:27 PM
Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 3131
|
so i call Guitar Center and Sam Ash in the NY/NJ area, and ask for keyboard dept.
i then ask rep: do you have the Tyros 3 on the floor?
rep says? Tyros..Tyros...let me see.. That's a Korg right?
you kidding? why are the people working @ these stores so ignorant and clueless?
i remember back in the days, not only did they know the makes, models, etc, they new how to demo stuff, they knew how to play the stuff, they knew the differences amongst the instruments, they knew how to edit/program, etc,
nowadays it seems like they're last job was stockboy at the local A&P, ShopRite,
how sad...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244412 - 10/09/08 05:23 AM
Re: Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/08/00
Posts: 4715
Loc: West Virginia
|
There's another very important factor not mentioned. Yes..., the pro arranger is out of touch with the younger market. That has been obvious for years and clearly the makers target a more mature group for the sales of the high end arrangers.
The younger market (from what I've seen) do want an arranger, but the problem is that NO arranger to date really caters to the modern music. I'm not talking electronica either like Hip Hip, Dance, Rap, ect.., but the more traditional styles today have changed and even the high end arrangers do not reflect this. The arrangers still tend to favor the more old school forms of these styles.
Plus the younger generation are seeing the price tag on these things and shittin their pants on the spot! The younger crowd is going to the WS because they get more modern styles of music from them..., and for them it's a no brainer when they see a Motif XS6 selling for $2199 and the Tyros 3 selling for $3899.
I can't tell you how many times I've talked to someone in their 20's who were lucky enough to find a high end arranger to test.., but were completey turned off by the styles and the price.
These things cost a fortune because for years the target market (the home player) has beeen willing to pay this price. I still say that the problem is what a Yamaha rep told me several years ago regarding the target market for the high end arrangers.. The major problem with that way of thinking now is that TIMES HAVE SERIOUSLY CHANGED, and that "disposable income" isn't as disposable as it used to be for many of those buyers today.
The prices need to come down simple as that. There's no reason a 61 key arranger from Yamaha designed for the home player, and targeted at the home player (which can be seen by it's overall construction)..., should cost more than Yamaha's top end 88 key workstation. That in itself makes no sense. One being an arranger and the other workstation means NOTHING.., as there is NOTHING that truely justifies such a huge price gap between the two. Some of you guys say styles styles styles, yet really haven't a clue as to how much work goes into the drum patterns and arps on a WS.
A good example...., look at the budget mid line arrangers. Look at the price of the S-900 for example..., then compare that to the price of these budget workstations. Even the budget arranger market is higher (even though these keyboard are also built with the home player in mind).
As long as people are willing to pay these sky-high jacked prices on these arrangers, they have no reason to make them more affordable. The price doesn't just affect the buyer either. You also don't see them in stores because of the cost to the dealers as well.
Keyboard departments are VERY expensive to run. The cost to get them set up is enough to change a store owners mind. I was helping a friend who owns a local music store who wanted to set up a keyboard department and have me run it for him. In the end after talking to all the reps (he almost physically threw the Yamaha rep out the door due to the minimal purchase he would have to make and then being told his store had to be moved around in order to sell them.., even though he already had a keyboard section reserved), but the overall cost of getting it up and running was just too much for him.
[This message has been edited by squeak_D (edited 10-09-2008).]
_________________________
GEAR: Yamaha MOXF-6, Casio MZX-500, Roland Juno-Di, M-Audio Venom, Roland RS-70, Yamaha PSR S700, M-Audio Axiom Pro-61 (Midi Controller). SOFTWARE: Mixcraft-7, PowerTracks Pro Audio 2013, Beat Thang Virtual, Dimension Le.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244413 - 10/09/08 09:27 AM
Re: Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/27/03
Posts: 2417
Loc: CA
|
One of the Guitar Center where I live has had a Technics KN2600 sitting in the "PRO" keyboard section for around a year now with nobody snatching it up. One reason being, they are asking way too much for it and most people know by now that Technics doesn't make keyboards anymore. I'm really not sure how well high-end arrangers are selling at the local Guitar Centers near me. I suppose I could ask next time I go and try and get a feel on what direction Guitar Center might be taking regarding high and mid range arrangers. I've felt for a long time now that Workstations and Arrangers would more or less "meld" together and it is beginning to happen e.g. with Yamaha's Motif ES/XS and Korg's M3 with Karma 2.0, etc. But I think you're right in that the "terms" used on arrangers will be "changed" to more professionally sounding names and terms. The current stigma regarding: Auto-Accompaniment, Styles, the word "Arranger", Etc., all have that "toy" symbolism ascribed to them in the minds of the traditional Workstation crowd. To overcome that stigma the actual symbols, names, and terms, would need to be changed to gain the acceptance of the Workstation professionals in my opinion. Yamaha is doing that already by saying "Arpeggios" and "Chord Recognition" and Korg is using the term Karma in a similar fashion for the M3. Unless Arrangers can "turn the corner" and be more than just a "looped based" robotic music generator with no variance in the way the music is generated or presented, I think they will go the way of Home Organs also. With the prices for high-end arrangers going up and up and up, yet people are still getting this robotic artificially presented looped based mechanical connotation attached with them; that the once sizzle will soon fizzle, with people demanding more for their money or opting out of buying an arranger altogether. And the Big Three and others that apply arranger type functions into their Workstations need to "turn the corner" as well when incorporating those arranger type functions into them. Giving them different names helps but the technology that drives them needs to change and improve as well. Like Ketron is trying to do with the Audya and Lionstracs is trying to do with the Mediastation. Best, Mike
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Mackie HR824 MKII Studio Monitors, Mackie 1202 VLZ Pro Mixer (made in USA), Cakewalk Sonar Platinum, Shure SM58 vocal mic.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244415 - 10/09/08 10:25 AM
Re: Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14194
Loc: NW Florida
|
First of all... It isn't the nomenclature of MotifXS terms that need to be changed. It is the way they WORK. As long as a button performs the FUNCTION of a fill, I don't give a damn what it is called! But on MotifXS, even the loops which are programmed to be fills cannot be dropped into in realtime. In other words, when you want a fill, you have to cue it up a bar ahead of time.. You can't just drop into it and it be in sync with what is already going on. Plus there are no 'play this loop once, then go to this other loop' commands, which would serve as Intro loops, and no 'play this loop once and stop' which would serve as an ending. Other than that, functionality is quite similar in many ways, and with the right content could be very arranger-like in many ways. Plus, of course, for your $1800 LESS than a Tyros you get tempo synchronized audio loops, a full featured sampler, multitrack DAW features, digital connectivity, Cubase integration, and a sound palette, especially drums, that blows the Tyros away. SA2, Mega and Live! sounds that you are familiar with, and an effects architecture that puts the T3 to shame. No harmonizer though (yippee!)... And, of course, a choice of 61, 76 AND 88 keys. Something for everyone. Kids aren't nearly as dumb as you think they are. Can't say the same for us, I'm afraid...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244416 - 10/09/08 01:45 PM
Re: Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 3131
|
i wisg they would have retired the the Tyros line with the T2
i really wish they would have expanded on the Motif XS idea, and make it more arranger like... intros, fills, i mean it's almost there with arpegg, etc,
imagine having a MOTIF arranger, something built well, (not cheap platic), and something that's affordable, not $4K, or over $5k which the Ketron Audya will probably sell for
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244417 - 10/09/08 01:46 PM
Re: Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244420 - 10/09/08 06:37 PM
Re: Tyros 3 WHO ? Many Sales Reps are CLUELESS
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14194
Loc: NW Florida
|
Originally posted by tony mads usa: Well, these 'young' people are going to 'age' too ... let's hope they do it QUICK !!!
t.
When they age, they are going to want to play what they played as youngsters, as do we... They won't be playing arrangers, because they STILL won't be the right keyboard for their music Our only hope is to get arranger type control of modern WS's... They are cheaper, better, and more abundant, and will be around for LONG after arrangers have gone the way of the 'home organ' Personally, I think if a MotifXS had arranger style loop control, or a FantomG could control it's tempo-synched loops and arps with chords and had the same arranger-like capabilities (without using the WORD 'arranger' or 'variations and fills' to cloud the issue), I would be using one now, quite happily... and save myself around $1500 But you are NEVER going to see a twentysomething start to use arrangers to play bossas and bigband when he retires!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|