It's AMAZING how the written word can be (mis)interpreted depending on our own bias, mood, etc.
trtjazz.... If I may be so bold as to offer MY interpretation:
"...in real terms, the 'net version' doesn't do it any favours..." = "the bottom line is the internet version, because of its lack of quality, is not doing you justice" ...
I choose not to think that Big Red was saying your stuff sucks, MP3 or live !!!
t.

Thank you Tony Mads - that's exactly what I was intending. I had said in my original post in this thread that I generally liked trt's stuff but, again, the sound I'm hearing from my computer is just not up to it.
For the record, my computer is a stock 1.2 gig, 40 meg Hewlett-Packard with a cable modem and the speakers are Yamaha YST-MS201 with a sub-woofer.

I really don't care to start a beef over this...I did not read Gary's post as saying anything about cloudiness. He also said he thought the harmonizer sounded "terrific". So my interpretation of your words here I think are loose but accurate. And that's ok, your entitled to not like it, or the way it sounded.

To me it's the best sounding harmonizer I've ever heard including Korg's....just differring opinons on sound again is all. The cd version of course sounds better and that's what I do the mix for....the paying customer.

------------------
jam on,
Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html

Gotcha ya. I didn't think it was an insult, but I wasn't quite sure where you were headed.
My largest level of success with using harmonizers has been to get the correct balance. Even the TC needs to be balanced correctly with the lead or else it sounds odd. I can't imagine working without one anymore ...... it's opened up my sound so much. Mills Brothers, Beach Boys, Andrews Sisters ....... they're all mine now !

[This message has been edited by Uncle Dave (edited 04-10-2003).]