I don't disagree with you there. I think the technology may be there but whatever the solution, it's implementation, which would probably include a complete revamping of the infrastructure ie. delivery systems, etc., could not be implemented in ten years, probably not even 20. However, that window has to have a start point.

Where we (respectfully) disagree is that I don't have a problem with the government lending a hand (including a little R&D cash to universities and (I know, blasphemy) large corporations) to accelerate the process. This would include a major commitment to education to produce more scientists and engineers by making college more affordable. I DO believe that technology holds the key to lessening our dependence on oil, wherever the source. Neither drilling nor praying is going to cut it. Of course, as a national attitude, we could start right now with a little old-fashioned conservationism. Do we really need a 451hp C63 Mercedes to haul around (usually) 1 person to the store for a quart of milk? Only in America, baby. Even now, Ford has a small diesel on the market in Europe which gets 65mpg but it's not cost-effective to market it in America. What's wrong with this picture. I'm starting to think we don't WANT to help ourselves out of this energy crisis. Obviously, someone, somewhere is profiting from a situation which may not be in America's (or even the World's from an environmental point of view) best interest.

Rory, good thoughts. I enjoy these types of discussions and hearing other's points of view, even if I don't always agree with them.

chas