You wanna "join" Sheriff? Well, we're stil friends. So you'll have to be one to.
Oh, that's what it's all about. Damn. Good thing I deleted that sarcastic crap I wrote you. Although it was good. I'll save it for those who deserve it though.
Actually Sheriff and I have resolved our issues long time ago. his post has been just sitting here. So if you felt obligated to kick my butt for me being mean to him or something it's a bit uncalled for. You're not doing either of us a favor by jumping in and thus jumping to conclusions.

To be a hundred percent serious about the usefulness of 196k (vs 96k) I can honestly say that I have very little to notice there but don't mind recording at a 196k since I'm not pressed for hard disk space. I do it because I can. However, using 24 bit /96k as in oppose to 16 bit /44.1k makes a difference for me.

-ED-



[This message has been edited by 3351 (edited 10-09-2005).]