Originally Posted By: rosetree
Originally Posted By: abacus
The thing these days is that laptops are so cheap and powerful, (And there are many orchestral VST libraries on the market) demand for hardware modules is small and non-profitable. (Also a laptop and VSTs are no more difficult to set up then a hardware module these days)
Bill

Another topic we've often discussed already... I agree that for studio use everyone goes VST, and that's most probably why Emulator had to stop manufacturing their hardware modules around 2000. But does a 'cheap' laptop really suffice? According to all I read you need a powerful, more expensive one for the good libraries. Then, I was thinking about using orchestral sounds live, and there I still consider hardware sound generators as both easier and less glitch-prone. In fact, there IS a reasonable demand for the Roland Integra, it's not one of Roland's total flops (like BK-9).
I even see one advantage of sound modules for live use which they didn't have in the late 1990s: with an iPAD (or other tablet) and a proper app (to be developed by the manufacturer preferably), even a module can be controlled very conveniently as if it had a large touchscreen of its own.


The bigdownfall of the big VST orchestrall stuff is loading times and processor use... I wouldnt use LASS or anything in that order on just a normall laptop


But... if you want impressive orchestrall stuff, turn your head towards the Korg Kronos expanions... KA pro is the name and they are close to what those VSTs offer and fit in a workstation..

_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Roland Jupiter 80, Ipad pro.

http://keyszone.boards.net