Originally posted by Nick G:
Korg have a TOTL Arranger.. what is its competitor? Yamaha Tyros.
Both instruments in each class have their equal amount of pros and cons. Not one of them is superior to another by fact. only by needs / use and personal preference.
So Yamaha have not changed their sound engine as many times as Korg. To me it makes absolutely no difference to us as users... why should it???
As long as they are updating features and samples. which they are... what's the problem here?
To me the fact that Yamaha can keep the same technology and AWM/AWM2 engine but keep on bringing out new sounds is a great innovation by itself. why make a new engine if you Don't have to??
I just don't see your point in this argument?
Nick,
James has been on this Yamaha bashing trip for sometime (he is a little classier than FransN
) and it is obvious he is coming from a Korgian fanboy position.
I know many people who say both Korg and Yamaha are basically equal in sound quality (although Korg keeps searching to find something better) and these opinions come from people who own both.
Yamaha's AWM is not the AWM of old, despite have the same acronym...the samples have been steadily improved and updated over the years, to where AWM is every bit the equal(again, some would say better) of anything else on the market.
Yamaha's Clavinova Pianos use AWM...they are among the finest digitals produced.
James "point" is no more than just taking a shot at Yamaha, and using the same old BS he used before.
Re-cycled, Korgian fanboy-ism at it's finest.
Ian
Now, let's get back on topic. My apologies to Chony.
[This message has been edited by ianmcnll (edited 10-31-2010).]
Previous Topic
Index
