No I wouldn't compare the V-Piano with TOTL Clavinovas...they have more sounds, for one thing, and at least you don't need a workaround (or laptop) to access sounds.

The T3 is new...the arranger sections in the latest CVP are like the T2's...the new CVPs will be out soon enough...then you can compare if you wish.

You might want to compare the V-Piano with the Roland KR-series...you know...heavy, expensive and a pale shadow of the G-70.

They should have at least put ARX expansion slots on the V-Piano...especially since they are on the much cheaper instruments....what were they thinking?

Sometimes your points are valid, but these are not...I think we both know that the V-Piano could have been much better realized than it is at present...so close, yet so far away.

The tuning fork people would have done a much better job.


The V-Piano, a one trick pony, or more appropriately, draft horse, that could have been contender with a bit more breeding.

Bottom line... I think it could have been done better.

Think you'll change my mind?

Not a chance.

Keep your stick on the ice.

Ian

[This message has been edited by ianmcnll (edited 02-09-2009).]