I think the Tyros II will sound great if Yamaha follows even remotely the great sounds that are on its brother - (big brother I might add ) the Tyros. Although that may not be the case since the opposite scenario has been reported on the Roland G70 vs. the VA7. Some say Roland has taken a step backwards with the G70 and there is essentially no overall improvement over their former Flagship the VA7. I do think most people are referring to the Styles on the G70 and not necessarily the sounds themselves. Although I have not heard any rave reviews about the sounds on the G70 from either the Web or our own members. Except maybe the Drum Kits. They have been reported to be very good.

So we shall see if the Tyros II is indeed just a "slight" cosmetic change or Yamaha truly produces a gem of an Arranger.

Without a 76 key version a lot of hearts will be disappointed regardless. And Yamaha will lose in my opinion the substantial revenue that a 76 key version could generate. They did it with the Motif/ES series why won't they do it with their Flagship Arrangers??

Nothing ventured, nothing gained as they say.

Btw, I think the copyright thing would be one of trademark infringement. The trademark being the 'name' "Tyros 2" used by a Company; and in this case an established and well recognized company Mead/Johnson.

Just think if someone tried to use the name "Microsoft" for a product. Or even a remote derivative of its name like "MicroShaft" and try to sell it as such. Unfortunately Bill would have none of that. A lawsuit would entail so fast it would make your head swim. The same thing might happen if Yammie uses Tyros 2 for the name of its new Arranger. I don't know if they would want to take the chance.

I think if they use roman numerals though they should be okay, although I could be mistaken about that.

They should just settle it and name it the name I gave it from the start i.e. "Tyros PRO XL". Although they should eliminate the "PRO" if they decide not to make a 76 key version.

Best regards,
Mike