SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#96755 - 11/18/05 07:00 AM Commercial SMF's
Fran Carango Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
Scott, I was thinking...why would it be ,that you think SMF's[especially Tune1000] sound inferior to arranger playing and other sources...

I think part of the problem may be your inexperience using instruments that sound good[especially SMF playback]...Yamaha is poor in sequence playback of SMF's[XG...forget it]...And your other favorite choice of keyboard..Technics, also lacks in this department...

If you allowed yourself[with open mind] to listen ..playback with a quality GS instrument...you may develop a different opinion...

Also, give a listen to a quality sequence played by a Ketron product..

I have sequences that I use with GS instruments...you almost can't tell from the original recording...There are some great sequence program people that are detailed oriented, and deserve to be played on a Roland GS..

No flaming here...just another observation..
_________________________
www.francarango.com



Top
#96756 - 11/18/05 07:52 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
Dnj Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
Quote:
Originally posted by Fran Carango:

..Yamaha is poor in sequence playback of SMF's[XG...forget it]...And your other favorite choice of keyboard..Technics, also lacks in this department...

If you allowed yourself[with open mind] to listen ..playback with a quality GS instrument...you may develop a different opinion...

Also, give a listen to a quality sequence played by a Ketron product..

I have sequences that I use with GS instruments...you almost can't tell from the original recording...There are some great sequence program people that are detailed oriented, and deserve to be played on a Roland GS..



Fran is So correct for sure......there is no comparison...Yamaha stinks at SMF playback to my ears.........Roland & Ketron will make you hear songs the way they are supposed to be heard & played too.

Top
#96757 - 11/18/05 08:31 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
GlennT Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/01/02
Posts: 1790
Loc: Medina, OH, USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Dnj:
Roland & Ketron will make you hear songs the way they are supposed to be heard & played too


Especially Ketron. The SD1 has a unique feature that allows you to utilize their "live drums" on any SMF playback... very cool.

Glenn

Top
#96758 - 11/18/05 08:51 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
BillErickson Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 08/23/04
Posts: 30
Loc: Portland, Oregon USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Fran Carango:
Scott, I was thinking...why would it be ,that you think SMF's[especially Tune1000] sound inferior to arranger playing and other sources...


Ya know, Fran, I don't think Scott's preference for arranger vs. SMF's has anything to do with the "quality" of the sound, but rather with the more "dynamic", "interactive" nature of using styles vs. the "hard-wired" programming of an SMF. With the arranger you can make adjustments to the tune on-the-fly according to the mood of the audience, adding an extra verse or two if the song is going well and you wanna keep 'em dancing, or shortening it cleanly if the mood says it's time to move on.

Granted, with a SMF you can make it sound more like the original CD (which may be important in certain contexts), but you loose the ability to "adapt" the song to your own creative ideas and the give-and-take between the artist and audience in real-time.



[This message has been edited by BillErickson (edited 11-18-2005).]

Top
#96759 - 11/18/05 09:05 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
Tony Rome Offline
Member

Registered: 12/11/04
Posts: 1374
Loc: Cozumel Mexico
Quote:
Originally posted by BillErickson:
Ya know, Fran, I don't think Scott's preference for arranger vs. SMF's has anything to do with the "quality" of the sound, but rather with the more "dynamic", "interactive" nature of using styles vs. the "hard-wired" programming of an SMF. With the arranger you can make adjustments to the tune on-the-fly according to the mood of the audience, adding an extra verse or two if the song is going well and you wanna keep 'em dancing, or shortening it cleanly if the mood says it's time to move on.

Bill, I think that you have hit upon a very good and important point that most have not thought about....very sharp observation on your part...I'm new to all of it and what you are saying makes perfect sense...also, I think that the level of the player would make a huge difference ...the more you know or the better you are, the less your need for help or dependence on outside sources...where in Scott's case, he is a music instructor and very proficient
in his knowledge of music would need less than I would.....thank you for your post
Tony Rome

Top
#96760 - 11/18/05 09:26 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
Fran Carango Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
Bill that is true...but I am referring more of the "canned" notion..

BTW, with today's top arrangers,,you can place markers in SMF's allowing flexibility to go back to the bridge, or even close out a tune...You are not locked in...It's just like working with a band, but you have all the control and no mistakes..
_________________________
www.francarango.com



Top
#96761 - 11/18/05 09:43 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
abacus Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5345
Loc: English Riviera, UK
Interesting topic, but don’t forget that the reason Roland introduced the GS sound set was because they wanted to get out of the limitation of 128 voices that General Midi allowed, Yamaha also did the same with there XG sound set.
Creative Labs with their earlier sound cards also supplied the GS sound set that could be loaded and played by the Sound Blaster cards, thus giving a vaster wealth of sounds compared to the Onboard FM synthesis.
The GS sounds also come as standard with Windows Media Player, and you can select them from the Sounds and Audio Devices in Control Panel. (If your computer uses an Onboard Sound Chip then the GS voices are set up by default)
Interestingly the GS sounds are not that well known compared to XG which became the most used standard after GM.

Bill
_________________________
English Riviera:
Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).

Top
#96762 - 11/18/05 09:55 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
Fran Carango Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/26/99
Posts: 9673
Loc: Levittown, Pa, USA
Bill I am not sure I agree totally with you..
You are correct that GS incorporated variation sounds and not just the GM standard of 128 patches.
But from day one the Sequence programmers go to standard has been GS [actually a true GS as in Roland GS instruments]..even today it is the standard..

Although the new PC's have the licensed standard GS wavetable..it does not behave as a Roland GS product..
They use the standard GS potential differences from GM , but do not utilize the variation sounds[tones] and drum kits accurately as a Roland Hardware piece, or Roland's GS software..

I don't believe Yamaha's XG has the same broad appeal[except Yammie people]...
_________________________
www.francarango.com



Top
#96763 - 11/18/05 10:10 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
Roel Offline
Member

Registered: 06/24/99
Posts: 1232
For those who prefer SMF above arranger-playing :
In my (limited?) view, using SMF is the same as using karaoke-tracks. When you use karaoke songs they can sound like the original songs, but hey ..... I'm a musician, NOT a discjockey !!

Within a few seconds it's clear to me wether the playing is 'live' or fully sequenced (SMF)..... 'the easy way'. Please have a listen at the 'demo/songs' homepages of various members and many things become clear!

Bill is very right!

Top
#96764 - 11/18/05 10:13 AM Re: Commercial SMF's
Stephenm52 Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 04/13/05
Posts: 5126
Loc: USA
I'm gonna throw my 2 cents in. I'm a rookie here, I don't make my living in the music business and most likely will not. For me it's a part time have some fun gig. I understand there's lots of discussion here and it's very stimulating conversation sometimes very amusing as well. The one question I ask if Scott prefers performing with certain equipment and parameters and Fran doing them his way and both their audiences happy with what they hear. Why then is one performer trying to sell the other on why his method is better? Or why his gear is better than the others?

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online