|
|
|
|
|
|
#457757 - 09/09/18 07:11 PM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: shueymusic]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#457770 - 09/10/18 03:35 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5508
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
When paired with the SD40, the great sounds of Yamaha can be played with the Ketron styles. Why not SD40 voices, also, like I use with my SK1?
Bernie
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#457774 - 09/10/18 05:38 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
Edited by Dnj (09/10/18 05:49 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458065 - 09/14/18 01:47 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458077 - 09/14/18 07:04 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Member
Registered: 06/20/12
Posts: 82
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458081 - 09/14/18 08:45 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Member
Registered: 11/19/17
Posts: 596
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458095 - 09/14/18 12:46 PM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Dnj]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
I don't know about that here, people want to just fire up their arranger kb, select a style, and play songs.. but once you mention playing with Midi files, editing, creating tracks, from scratch, etc, etc, ...things get very quiet.....but good luck to whoever gets one to play enjoy. Donny, it doesn’t even have a sequencer... You use it either with a daw, or with an arranger module.. Or stand alone, with a live band or friends.. Its a peformance key, not a workstation..
Edited by Bachus (09/14/18 12:48 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458121 - 09/15/18 04:00 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
I don't know about that here, people want to just fire up their arranger kb, select a style, and play songs.. but once you mention playing with Midi files, editing, creating tracks, from scratch, etc, etc, ...things get very quiet.....but good luck to whoever gets one to play enjoy. Donny, it doesn’t even have a sequencer... You use it either with a daw, or with an arranger module.. Or stand alone, with a live band or friends.. Its a peformance key, not a workstation.. Bachus, by the way, it DOES have a sequencer. It says so in the specs under "Performance Recorder" at Yamaha's website. ( https://ca.yamaha.com/en/products/music_production/synthesizers/modx/specs.html )
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458125 - 09/15/18 07:16 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Mikem]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
I don't know about that here, people want to just fire up their arranger kb, select a style, and play songs.. but once you mention playing with Midi files, editing, creating tracks, from scratch, etc, etc, ...things get very quiet.....but good luck to whoever gets one to play enjoy. Donny, it doesn’t even have a sequencer... You use it either with a daw, or with an arranger module.. Or stand alone, with a live band or friends.. Its a peformance key, not a workstation.. Bachus, by the way, it DOES have a sequencer. It says so in the specs under "Performance Recorder" at Yamaha's website. ( https://ca.yamaha.com/en/products/music_production/synthesizers/modx/specs.html ) Thats not what i call a sequencer.. Its more like a scratchpad... Not really usefull at all.. Believe me i tried and played with it on the montage quite extensively.. Its comparable with the recording features a dp had like 20 years ago.. Just real live recording your playing.. No edditing at all..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458248 - 09/18/18 06:25 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: mweuch]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458411 - 09/21/18 08:17 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458479 - 09/22/18 08:16 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458522 - 09/23/18 01:50 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5347
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
I wonder how many arranger players are interested in a unit like this vs an all in one arranger kb Its not a matter of choice between... The question should be, how many people would like to have the features of both in their rig.... A lot of arranger players, but not many pro (Synth/Workstation) players, pro players have to take into account cost as well as features and the extra cost of adding the arranger features would make them too expensive, (Plus they tend to look down on arrangers) arranger players are primarily home hobby players (This is who the arranger keyboard is targeted at) who don’t mind spending the extra to get extra features, as it’s for their pleasure, not financial gain. (Plus they tend to get intimidated by complex features even though it is just psychological) Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458556 - 09/24/18 02:37 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: abacus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
I wonder how many arranger players are interested in a unit like this vs an all in one arranger kb Its not a matter of choice between... The question should be, how many people would like to have the features of both in their rig.... A lot of arranger players, but not many pro (Synth/Workstation) players, pro players have to take into account cost as well as features and the extra cost of adding the arranger features would make them too expensive, (Plus they tend to look down on arrangers) arranger players are primarily home hobby players (This is who the arranger keyboard is targeted at) who don’t mind spending the extra to get extra features, as it’s for their pleasure, not financial gain. (Plus they tend to get intimidated by complex features even though it is just psychological) Bill The high end instrument being to complex and overwhelming in general is a non issue in the highest category of instruments.. (except for the Genos).. because in general anyone making use of a high end instrument with all these features should be an experienced player in the first place.. as other-ways he might have been much better off in a cheaper category of products... but then i can imagine companies wanting to sell their most expensive products to everyone.. In the Genos its clear they made the interface very accessible.. which should be this way also if they implement other new high end features.. in any other business there always is a product with all the top features and everything a company has in it.. take for example Yamaha..(mobile product range) if you want top end piano sounds..CP-4 IF you want top end arranger sounds.. Genos If you want top end ARPS.. Montage If you want slider and knobs with visual feedback .. Genos/Montage If you want 8 sounds split and layered freely over the keyboard .. Montage If you want a sequencer.. Genos IF you want on board sound edditting .. Montage if you want Audio over USB and DAW controll.. Montage If you want ensemble or SA2 sounds.. Genos If you want FM synthesis.. Montage If you want a VH onboard.. Genos If you want 88 keys with aftertouch Montage If you want 88 keys with escapement CP-4 You probably saw my point by now.. In the end i have said a million time.. its just software, and its already programmed, that it would make the instruments much more expensive is what corporations want you to believe.. The whole marketing idea behind Yamaha is that they want to sell you multiple keyboards.. and they are doing great in that department.. As quite a lot of people own both an arranger as well as a workstation/performance synth/DP Having to buy 2 instruments(or more) in the case of a pro player will always cost more then a single instrument with all the features.. The MODX in particular shows that all those high end features of the montage, don't have to be expensive.. and can easily be added to the Genos... or even a new range of instruments incorporating the best of all 3 Yamaha choices.. Things like 8 voices for main part easilly controllable trough the sliders, should not cost much resources.. when added to lets say the genos.. Same goes for adding the DAW controll/USB audio, or arps and motion sequences for every of the 8 tracks.. its all software.. Also there is a lot of complaints about the Genos(and even the montage) piano sounds on psrtutorial.com and yamahasynthforum.com fact is that with the virtual technollogy not implemented on the Montage and Genos, Piano will never sound as authentic as on the Yamaha piano range that costs half or even less money. Doesn't a 5000 dollar instrument the best piano sound you can deliver? The only reason its not in the Genos is not money, but the marketing strategy of Yamaha of trying to sell you more then one instrument. Another example is the MOXD thats extremely light and really close in performance to MONTAGE, is many gigging players considering to buy a MOXD on top of their MONTAGE, just for portabillity, size and weight. Now we should not talk about 88 keys for Genos, thats indeed a whole different discussion.. but the other parts should not be hard to implement. As allways on this topic, i disagree with probably most here.. altough i am sure with time, more and more people will come to see it my way.. why doesn't yamaha's piano partner app that has many lovely features on the ipad function with the moxd8? .. and no, its not just Yamaha, Roland has allways been the champion of this strategy, and Korg is starting to walk on the same road.. So financially i guess, these companies get better by this strategy.. The only looser is the customer.. and thats us..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458568 - 09/24/18 06:15 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5347
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
HI Bachus
What you say is correct, but you have forgotten one vitally important problem, and it has nothing to do with software, (As you say that is easy to implement) it’s the fact that there are 3 separate teams at work here (Piano, Synth & Arranger) which would need to be combined, and this would become extremely problematical as jobs would be duplicated, different philosophy’s would not go well together (Which could mean some of the top designers going elsewhere) and redundancy’s would have to be made, this is further complicated as the design teams in big companies are spread worldwide, so it would take considerable restructuring (And financial resources) to achieve, then there is the problem that profits would fall as they would only be selling one type of instrument rather than 3, so don’t expect any changes in the near future. As technology advances the instruments will automatically be combined into a new single venture (Any name suggestions) with one new design team, (This will be because of consumer demand (Basically the young get older and the oldies die off) as styles change) however it will probably be some time yet as the move will be generational. (Whichever way you look at it, the instruments we play today are a dying (As are their players) but it is always difficult to predict how much time they have left)
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458586 - 09/24/18 10:27 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: abacus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
HI Bachus
What you say is correct, but you have forgotten one vitally important problem, and it has nothing to do with software, (As you say that is easy to implement) it’s the fact that there are 3 separate teams at work here (Piano, Synth & Arranger) which would need to be combined, and this would become extremely problematical as jobs would be duplicated, different philosophy’s would not go well together (Which could mean some of the top designers going elsewhere) and redundancy’s would have to be made, this is further complicated as the design teams in big companies are spread worldwide, so it would take considerable restructuring (And financial resources) to achieve, then there is the problem that profits would fall as they would only be selling one type of instrument rather than 3, so don’t expect any changes in the near future. As technology advances the instruments will automatically be combined into a new single venture (Any name suggestions) with one new design team, (This will be because of consumer demand (Basically the young get older and the oldies die off) as styles change) however it will probably be some time yet as the move will be generational. (Whichever way you look at it, the instruments we play today are a dying (As are their players) but it is always difficult to predict how much time they have left)
Bill Actually there is 4 teams with yamaha... One team that develops all the technical features and programming.. And then there are the teams that implement them into the keyboards.. this team also works closely together with the content teams.. But all the technical parts and programming come from one single team... there is for example one AWM2 engine in both montage as modx as psr as genos.. all the same engine.. comming from one team.. The product team decides on sub features, like edditing capabilities, and the technical team implements them again in the product.. so if an arranger team decides there needs to be a feature from the montage in the genos2... its teh same technical team that implements it... We also know that the synth product team is in the US, the arranger team is in Germany and the piano team is in Japan.. all teams also have an extension at the Japan headquarters.. that closely works together with the technical team
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458595 - 09/24/18 11:04 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5347
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
HI Bachus
What you say is correct, but you have forgotten one vitally important problem, and it has nothing to do with software, (As you say that is easy to implement) it’s the fact that there are 3 separate teams at work here (Piano, Synth & Arranger) which would need to be combined, and this would become extremely problematical as jobs would be duplicated, different philosophy’s would not go well together (Which could mean some of the top designers going elsewhere) and redundancy’s would have to be made, this is further complicated as the design teams in big companies are spread worldwide, so it would take considerable restructuring (And financial resources) to achieve, then there is the problem that profits would fall as they would only be selling one type of instrument rather than 3, so don’t expect any changes in the near future. As technology advances the instruments will automatically be combined into a new single venture (Any name suggestions) with one new design team, (This will be because of consumer demand (Basically the young get older and the oldies die off) as styles change) however it will probably be some time yet as the move will be generational. (Whichever way you look at it, the instruments we play today are a dying (As are their players) but it is always difficult to predict how much time they have left)
Bill Actually there is 4 teams with yamaha... One team that develops all the technical features and programming.. And then there are the teams that implement them into the keyboards.. this team also works closely together with the content teams.. But all the technical parts and programming come from one single team... there is for example one AWM2 engine in both montage as modx as psr as genos.. all the same engine.. comming from one team.. The product team decides on sub features, like edditing capabilities, and the technical team implements them again in the product.. so if an arranger team decides there needs to be a feature from the montage in the genos2... its teh same technical team that implements it... We also know that the synth product team is in the US, the arranger team is in Germany and the piano team is in Japan.. all teams also have an extension at the Japan headquarters.. that closely works together with the technical team You have confirmed what I said; all manufactures have different teams all over the world that would need to be combined. BTW Virtually all of the sounds and features for Yamaha arrangers (Particularly the top models) are done by the UK team, with input also from Germany. Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458639 - 09/25/18 07:41 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: abacus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
HI Bachus
What you say is correct, but you have forgotten one vitally important problem, and it has nothing to do with software, (As you say that is easy to implement) it’s the fact that there are 3 separate teams at work here (Piano, Synth & Arranger) which would need to be combined, and this would become extremely problematical as jobs would be duplicated, different philosophy’s would not go well together (Which could mean some of the top designers going elsewhere) and redundancy’s would have to be made, this is further complicated as the design teams in big companies are spread worldwide, so it would take considerable restructuring (And financial resources) to achieve, then there is the problem that profits would fall as they would only be selling one type of instrument rather than 3, so don’t expect any changes in the near future. As technology advances the instruments will automatically be combined into a new single venture (Any name suggestions) with one new design team, (This will be because of consumer demand (Basically the young get older and the oldies die off) as styles change) however it will probably be some time yet as the move will be generational. (Whichever way you look at it, the instruments we play today are a dying (As are their players) but it is always difficult to predict how much time they have left)
Bill Actually there is 4 teams with yamaha... One team that develops all the technical features and programming.. And then there are the teams that implement them into the keyboards.. this team also works closely together with the content teams.. But all the technical parts and programming come from one single team... there is for example one AWM2 engine in both montage as modx as psr as genos.. all the same engine.. comming from one team.. The product team decides on sub features, like edditing capabilities, and the technical team implements them again in the product.. so if an arranger team decides there needs to be a feature from the montage in the genos2... its teh same technical team that implements it... We also know that the synth product team is in the US, the arranger team is in Germany and the piano team is in Japan.. all teams also have an extension at the Japan headquarters.. that closely works together with the technical team You have confirmed what I said; all manufactures have different teams all over the world that would need to be combined. BTW Virtually all of the sounds and features for Yamaha arrangers (Particularly the top models) are done by the UK team, with input also from Germany. Bill You obviously did not understand what i said... As there is a single team at yamaha that builds all the instruments The other parts of the teams are mostly content related..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458640 - 09/25/18 07:43 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#462014 - 11/21/18 10:10 PM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: cgiles]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Bachus, with such an extensive and comprehensive tonal pallet to choose from (Kronos, Super VSTi collection, etc.), what sounds or category of sounds did you feel needed 'shoring up' by the MODX? Is the quality of the tones equal to the Kronos? Better? or just different. OR, did you just want a Yamaha in your stable (for variety)? Curious minds want to know . chas BTW, are there any Android APPS similar to the IPAD apps you mention? Actually, the reason is i travel a lot for work lately on my current jobs, which often makes me sleep few nights a week in a hotel.. the modx is extremely light, and easy to take on the road, it replaced my roland go-piano.. It also offers yamaha’s arp’s which i like more then krogs karma, they are much easier to get imto programming and creating them. Soundwise, yes there are ither nuances on the modx, but not really much i miss on kronos/pa4x.. But for the money it blows everything else out of the water.. Combined with the ipad and the many ipad apps, it makes a very fun time pass on the long evenings.. All high end musical apps mostly are only available for ipad.. there are some android apps and some on both, but i dont use android devices.. my main apps beatmaker3, cubasis, gadget, garageband... but also things like reason impc and the whole slew of au units are not available on android. The ipad OS has all the tools for this android does not. There is no audiobus or Au units on androids to start with, these allow you to connect all music apps and softsound modules together on ipad..
Edited by Bachus (11/21/18 10:15 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#462125 - 11/24/18 03:51 AM
Re: New yamaha modx
[Re: ZootAllures]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Played one for about an hour at Guitar Center. I have a Motif ES for many years and know it's sounds intimately. I heard a lot of similar sounds between the two boards, although the MODX does have a few new sounds that are excellent. Mind you I focused on Guitar, organ, bass and EP and a few string sounds. I dabbled a bit with some other sounds, but not long enough to get a good feel. Perhaps there are bigger differences there. The feeling to me that the two sounded similar is not a bad thing at all. I love my ES to this day. If I no longer had it, I'd seriously consider this board. All in all, it sounds excellent. I also own a motif xs rack.. And a modx Yes many sounds are the same, but i found quickly that the new sounds have become my goto sounds on the modx, they are hugely better.. Add to that the linitations of only 4 sounds in a performance on the ES and the huge improvement in numbers as well as in quallity of the dsp, and its obvious why the modx at its current price is the new king of yamaha.. The organ sounds are for exampke vastly improved and finally sound like a b3.. The main piano and dp sounds are of a different galax, then the es ones And then the es does not have any AEM (super articulation) which makes arcoustic sounds with element swtching sound much more realistic. Just my opinions.. based on owning both the motif xs and having owned the es, and also owning a modx
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|