As many dealers reach out to us to carry our products, we would like to introduce one of our European partners in HOOLLAND - the Netherlands:-

http://muziekhuisdera.nl/catalogsearch/result/?q=ajam

They are very knowledgeable and willing to provide good service to our customers. They can be reached at:-

Muziekhuis Dera
Stationstraat 5
6411 NG HEERLEN
Tel: 0031-45-2080808
info@muziekhuisdera.nl
www.muziekhuisdera.nl


Thanks,

AJ

Style and sound wise, my Audya 76 is still king, IMO. I would also like to know how the SD9 compares.

Listening to the old demos, there are many new midi style loops, audio drum & guitar style loops that are not on the Audya.

I also hear new guitar voices amongst others that are not on the Audya. Thus the Audya will no longer be able to compete. This will indeed be the new Ketron flagship.

Henni

"This will indeed be the new Ketron flagship."

If they don't make another Audya, I guess it will have to be by default, but that would mean eliminating Audya features and adding more loops. No thanks.

This is just a cursory opinion based only on first glances:
Less polyphony-I know, it is used more efficiently.
no organ drawbars-just mix sliders
less styles-300 vs Audya 334(plus AJAM)
one mic output-vs 2
one line in-vs 2
no sub or aux outs-vs 4
Txt files ?
Plastic or metal case ? Weighs about three lbs less.

AJ said some time ago that the SD9 is not a replacement for the Audya. but the SD7. However, I am sure it is a great keyboard in many respects. I guess I am too old for the loopty loops they are pushing. I did see that CDG files are read. I use that on my Pa4X quite often.

Maybe AJ can give us a quantitative analysis and, whether they have ditched the veritable Audya.