 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412500 - 12/04/15 08:47 AM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
|
I would advise, that if you have time, start from scratch. Yes, the old Registrations convert just fine, but I sometimes fall into the trap of trying to make the new keyboard sound just like the old one, in the interest of time. I have done a mixture with this one, using my existing registrations as a starting point, then adjusting, changing styles, changing lead setups, etc., as I go along. Keeps a boy busy and out of trouble. 
_________________________
DonM
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412540 - 12/05/15 02:46 AM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5548
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
Thank you Don, I always value your opinion. That is what I will do.
I am rather impetuous.and had a thought of slapping my mem stick into the S970 Tuesday and going with it, The trouble is I wouldn't have the same incentive to make the board my own, as it were, if I took the S970 out too soon.
I guess I want my cake and eat it.
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40,Ketron Event X Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412557 - 12/05/15 11:23 AM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
|
O.K. We're not getting into sound right now. These are operational features:
The Korg takes 5-button foot switch, plus a dedicated Damper input and a programmable foot switch. It has a full row of programmable sliders, plus three programmable buttons just above the joy stick. It has a joystick, just above the touch strip. It has a touch strip. The sliders have 3 modes. One for volume controls of Style, RH 1, 2, and 3, LH, drums, Bass and MP3. Next mode is organ drawbars. Next mode the sliders are fully programmable to do whatever you want. Modes can be automatically select via Songbook or Performance, or manually selected. It has 3 right-hand voices. Transpose and Octave change are conveniently located. You can see the writing. No black on black labels. It has lots of dedicated buttons. For example Split, Mic Delay on/off, alternate VH settings, Talk . . . It has knobs to control mic volume, VH volume, amount of effects, double. It has a light to show you when the VH is engaged. It has a button to turn the mic off. It has a slider to adjust style level versus Lead voice volume. The inputs on the back have labels on the top of the keyboard, so you can see where to plug things in without seeing the back of the keyboard. It takes a standard AC plug. No wall wart. It has XLR mic connector. It has aux outputs and inputs. It has USB slot on front, plus extra one on the back, plus one for PC. It has nice touch screen. It has wonderful Songbook feature. Way better than Musicfinder or Registrations on PSR. It also has Performances, Korg-speak for Registrations. I use them only to have a bevy of lead sounds instantly available, and do everything else with the Songbook. There is a dedicated button to have the Performances change the style and voice, or just the voice. It has dual sequence/MP3 player. O.K. so I don't use that. It has a Chord Sequencer plus extensive regular sequencer, plus audio recorder. You can fully edit, save, replace or delete factory styles. It has phantom power. It has Power On setup, where everything you want is saved. When you turn it on it's ready to go. The Key-start mode is always on! You don't have to hit that button every time you start a song that is not save in Reg. It has a wonderful Vocal Harmonizer, as good as or better than many stand-alone units. It has very advanced e.q. and sound enhancement features. MAXX Audio. It has full-sized keys. It has Aftertouch. Every function is fully addressable via midi. Yamaha style controls require System Exclusive messages. Not needed on Korg, but it keeps me from using third party foot switch with the PSR. I'm sure I'm leaving out some stuff. All these things are important to me and make playing easier and more fun. None in itself is real critical, but as a package it is formidable. Oh, and it is not real heavy. A little heavier than PSR, maybe four pounds. I need the exercise anyway. It is the same size or maybe smaller than PSR! They fit in the same bag anyway. There are no bad choices these days; it's just that some suit certain players better.
_________________________
DonM
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412563 - 12/05/15 11:47 AM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15594
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
But, with all those attributes, it still doesn't even come remotely close to the PSR-S970 when it comes to sound quality and styles - at least not from what I've heard. Of course, I'm deaf as a post, so it doesn't make any difference.  Who knows, I may be getting a good buy on a lightly used S970. Gary 
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412567 - 12/05/15 12:10 PM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
|
I can send it back if I decide I don't want it, but we'll talk if it comes to that Gary. As far as sound, the Korg sounds great. Yamaha has great guitar sounds, but it's easy to load great guitar sounds into the Korg too. In fact the acoustic guitars on board are really good. The overdriven and distorted rock guitars are good. Where Yamaha wins so big is in the classic electrics from the 50's, 60's, and that is mostly because they have set up the DSPs so well. I've never needed a style for Korg that I haven't found, or for any other arranger in the past 10 years for that matter. There are hundreds of thousands of styles out there for Yamaha, but the vast majority or renamed, slightly edited, or versions from previous models. It would take weeks to go through them all, edit and save the ones you might possibly want. How many styles can you use?
_________________________
DonM
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412576 - 12/05/15 01:40 PM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15594
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
But, with all those attributes, it still doesn't even come remotely close to the PSR-S970 when it comes to sound quality and styles - at least not from what I've heard. Of course, I'm deaf as a post, so it doesn't make any difference.  Who knows, I may be getting a good buy on a lightly used S970. Gary Gary, have you done a side by side comparison of the S970 and the PA3x and PA4x? No, all I have heard are demos of the PA3x - which are OK, but not fantastic. Of course, as you well know, demos are often poorly recorded and do not reflect the instrument quality as they should. Now, I have played older models, and to me, the grand piano voices were marginal at best, the guitars were OK, but not on par with Yamaha, while the strings and brass were underwhelming at best when compared with Yamaha. The only Korg I've ever owned was the I3, and sold it just a few months after I purchased it and bought a Yamaha PSR-5700, which was a brute, sounded great, and was quite limited in the number of styles and voices. It weighed over 50 pounds, but I was a lot younger then, so it didn't matter.  I've only played a friend's S-950 for a couple hours, and it sounded incredible. Kinda like the S950 on steroids.  I sincerely believe that all of today's MOTL arrangers sound really good, and there is only subtle differences between them when it comes to overall sound. As for features, we all have our personal preferences, and for the most part, the vast majority of the features are rarely, and in some instances, never used. All the best, Gary 
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#412589 - 12/05/15 03:22 PM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: travlin'easy]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/16/02
Posts: 14377
Loc: East Greenwich RI USA
|
No, all I have heard are demos of the PA3x - which are OK, but not fantastic. Of course, as you well know, demos are often poorly recorded and do not reflect the instrument quality as they should. Now, I have played older models, and to me, the grand piano voices were marginal at best, the guitars were OK, but not on par with Yamaha, while the strings and brass were underwhelming at best when compared with Yamaha. All the best, Gary Yes, I agree ... I would never rate a keyboard - or ANY instrument - based on internet demos, nor would I judge a new instrument based on the sound of older models (I wouldn't judge a new vehicle based on the performance of older models either  ) ... I also believe that the beauty of sound is in the EAR of the beholder ... and very often we stick with what we are accustomed to ...
_________________________
t.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|