 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#378788 - 12/19/13 04:34 PM
Re: The main difference between OMB Arranger play and
[Re: cgiles]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/16/02
Posts: 14377
Loc: East Greenwich RI USA
|
chas ... a friend of mine who is an excellent sax player knew that he was going to lose his 9 - 5 due to 'downsizing' at the 'ripe old age' of 52 years ... fortunately, he had a year to prepare ... he did all the usual stuff to try to get another job but he was in a 'young persons' profession - computer graphics design ... he decided to augment his free lance graphics income by playing gigs, so along with some sax work with bands etc. he began studying piano really earnestly and got to the point where he could do solo gigs on piano or arranger at restaurants, CCs etc. AND he also did a fair amount of NH gigs as well ... he's NOT a vocalist, so I asked him how playing solo instrumentals was working at NHs and he said it was fine ... and apparently it was, because he did that for quite a while ... While WE (those of us on SZ who play them quite a bit) each have our own 'shtick'/delivery/style/whatever, the bottom line for NHs is that these people want to be entertained, and if you are entertaining as a solo instrumentalist, you will get work also ... Now as for the 'hysteria' over a new TOTL KB, I put that in the same place I put the hysteria over a new iPhone - "It's NEW, so it MUST be BETTER, so I HAVE TO have it" ... BTW ... I have no idea as to why you don't think you have the skill set to play an arranger ?!? 
_________________________
t.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#378790 - 12/19/13 05:02 PM
Re: The main difference between OMB Arranger play and
[Re: cgiles]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15594
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
I agree to some extent, Chas. For me, and many of the entertainers I know, both those doing the NH circuit and those doing the clubs, without good, high-quality vocals you're essentially out of business. When Sinatra performed with the Count Basie Band, the audiences didn't come to watch the band play - they came to hear Sinatra sing. That said, there are orchestras that I love to watch perform, Glenn Miller Orchestra, Dorsey Brothers Band, U.S. Navy Band, U.S. Army Band, they're incredible musicians as well as entertainers. The venues these guys play are sold out six months in advance and the tickets are not cheap. Audiences worldwide want to be entertained, and a great vocalist is usually a great entertainer as well. Sammy Davis Jr., Rascal Flats, Perry Como, Bing Crosby, Jimmy Buffett, Karen Carpenter, Sinatra, Elvis, The Beatles, they were and some still are, great entertainers and singers. Most people could care less about the band that backs them - vocals have always ruled. Great musicians can be found throughout the world, but great singers who are also entertainers are a rare commodity indeed. So, I contend that if you are a good to excellent vocalist you can make a good living in the OMB business, even if you cannot play worth a damned - I should know! Now, as you know, Chas, I waited more than a decade to upgrade from my PSR-3000, an instrument that served me very well during that period. I never considered upgrading with the S900, S-910 or newer Tyros series became available, simply because I didn't consider them to be beneficial to what I do. I did upgrade a few months ago to the S-950 because it had some outstanding, new features that would prove beneficial, and wouldn't hinder my performances or increase dead time between songs. And, it sounds one Hell of a lot better than the 3000. And, there have been several occasions where audience members asked if I had a new keyboard. So, I guess they do actually notice those backing sounds, but as was stated above, no one ever comes up to you and says they loved the way you played a particular song on the keyboard, but they frequently comment about the vocal performances. At least that has been my experience over the years, even when I played a guitar as a solo player/singer in a smoke-filled country bar. I only wish I were 50 years younger, had the knowledge I currently enjoy, and had just half the playing skills of Captain Russ, Chas, DonM, Uncle Dave, and some of our members from across the ponds. Who knows, if this were the case, I might have been successful enough to buy a bigger boat. But alas, I live with the cards I've been dealt, work nearly every day in a trade that many people only dream of. Cheers, Gary 
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#378793 - 12/19/13 05:13 PM
Re: The main difference between OMB Arranger play and
[Re: travlin'easy]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/16/02
Posts: 14377
Loc: East Greenwich RI USA
|
And, there have been several occasions where audience members asked if I had a new keyboard. So, I guess they do actually notice those backing sounds, but as was stated above, no one ever comes up to you and says they loved the way you played a particular song on the keyboard, but they frequently comment about the vocal performances. Cheers, Gary Gary ... I find it interesting that my experience has been the opposite of yours, in that no one this year has asked if I got a new KB (maybe the KORG doesn't sound better or different than my technics - although I KNOW it sounds different, and some sounds, like the sax, are not as good), and I have on a number of occasions been complimented on an instrumental ...
_________________________
t.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#378794 - 12/19/13 05:18 PM
Re: The main difference between OMB Arranger play and
[Re: cgiles]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15594
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Tony, I don't have your playing skills, therefore, it's my vocals that I rely on primarily. Yeah, I play some instrumentals, Last Date, polka medley, and several others, and I do them pretty darned well, but my vocals are my strong point. I think the audiences noticed the new sounds of the S-950 when I performed many of the songs that I previously performed on the 3000 - they really sounded different because of the improved instrument sounds. Gary 
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#378795 - 12/19/13 05:29 PM
Re: The main difference between OMB Arranger play and
[Re: cgiles]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
People I played for, or with, on a regular basis were more likely to notice a change in my keyboard...also other keyboard players.
I think a lot would depend on what you used as your primary solo instrument on the arranger...for quite some time now, the main piano sound on all arrangers has been excellent, so if you played mostly piano licks behind your vocals or used it mainly on instrumentals, I doubt if someone would notice a change.
However, guitar and wind sounds only became dramatically better in the last few years, so a new keyboard may be more noticeable if you tend to use those sounds as well.
Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#378917 - 12/21/13 01:36 AM
Re: The main difference between OMB Arranger play and
[Re: cgiles]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14507
Loc: NW Florida
|
Bottom line is, is ANYONE here making a living playing ONLY instrumentals? Sure, it's fine to do a few in your set, or evening, but try playing the whole night like that, see if your crowd drops or swells... (might be embarrassing if it swelled! LOL)
Sure, play something ELSE (guitar, sax, ocarina!) and the audience has something to look at, but play an evening doing the sax solo on the arranger... meh! Boooooorrrrriiiinnnnggggggg.
But, OTOH (you know I use two, don't you?!), let's not forget the most demanding, pickiest person in your audience...
YOU!
Hopefully, you hold your act to higher standards than your audience. And hopefully, you always want to push yourself harder, reach higher, achieve more... And that is the RIGHT reason to go for new gear from time to time. But there's a warning on the label... DON'T do it unless the new gear does something RADICALLY better. Don't waste your money on a few gewgaws and little else. Don't buy into the hype, don't let amazing demonstrators blind you, don't be a 'me too' buyer.
Find something in the feature set that makes you go 'I GOTS to have that! That will make a radical difference, that will allow me to do stuff I've NEVER done before'. And don't do it until you feel you have used at least 90% of the stuff on your OLD arranger. WAY too many ditching old gear for new long before they have mastered the current one, long before they have tried all the stuff that made them want it in the first place.
Let's be honest here... how many of us with a sampler in our arrangers doesn't actually USE IT? How many never touch the style editing? How many have dropped Markers into an SMF? And then rearranged an SMF on the fly?
Use what you have fully before you move on...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|