|
|
|
|
|
|
#344056 - 04/25/12 11:04 AM
Re: Yamaha Listens Part 2
[Re: lahawk]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/15/01
Posts: 1314
Loc: london,ontario.canada
|
Question for Yamaha. Do you want to build TOTL for home players, or do you want to build an arranger for professional user who would want to do indepth editing????
You would probably want them to be one thing with one keyboard but that is not even close. For pro players: No speakers please. I don't think we need audio loops, but only if you provide great drums(bfd2,superior drummer,addictive drums) Same thing with bass and the other tracks More control when we play live.Not every hall or restaurant/bar is the same.
More modern beats,otherwise you are killing arrangers from inside.
In depth synth engine(more than one)
Sliders or knobs,buttons that you can make it to your liking better midi editing. Some of these things are not new,every synth has them for 10-29 years.
I could go on and on with these things.
_________________________
MIKIMIKI
TYROS 5,BEHRINGER X32PRODUCER,YAMAHA DSR112,JBL PRX618s XLF,EV ZLX12p,SENNHEISER E945,....ETC
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#344059 - 04/25/12 12:18 PM
Re: Yamaha Listens Part 2
[Re: YamahaUS1]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14194
Loc: NW Florida
|
Perhaps the issue of pro editing vs. amateur OOTB friendliness could be addresses by having COMPUTER controlled in-depth editing, while the arranger itself stays fairly simple?
All that is needed is a file format that would allow the computer to read the styles, Performances, Voice data, Sampler data, etc., and then you could get into the nitty gritty without making the arranger itself over-complex.
I am pretty sure that most pro's that wanted all this degree of control would be willing to pony up a couple of hundred dollars or so for it, so there would be no need to raise the base price of the Tyros for features few would use.
And, let's face it... SOMEWHERE there must already be these kind of software tools floating around, because SOMEONE designs the voices, creates the Styles, edits the sounds, and does all the detail work YOU can't currently access. Converting it for public access would not be half the task of creating it from scratch.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#344060 - 04/25/12 12:40 PM
Re: Yamaha Listens Part 2
[Re: Diki]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/19/02
Posts: 2866
Loc: Tampa, FL
|
I totally agree with this...the Motif has iPad Apps that let you do sound design off of the keyboard. I have PC tools for the Korg Kronos that also let you do sound design on the PC. Yamaha has Voice design for the Tyros 4 with a PC application as well. They just need to bulk it up a bit. Most arranger players would not get this deep into the sound engine, i'm afraid. Perhaps the issue of pro editing vs. amateur OOTB friendliness could be addresses by having COMPUTER controlled in-depth editing, while the arranger itself stays fairly simple?
All that is needed is a file format that would allow the computer to read the styles, Performances, Voice data, Sampler data, etc., and then you could get into the nitty gritty without making the arranger itself over-complex.
I am pretty sure that most pro's that wanted all this degree of control would be willing to pony up a couple of hundred dollars or so for it, so there would be no need to raise the base price of the Tyros for features few would use.
And, let's face it... SOMEWHERE there must already be these kind of software tools floating around, because SOMEONE designs the voices, creates the Styles, edits the sounds, and does all the detail work YOU can't currently access. Converting it for public access would not be half the task of creating it from scratch.
_________________________
Al
Pa4x - LD Systems Maui 28 - Mackie Thumps
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#344070 - 04/25/12 03:12 PM
Re: Yamaha Listens Part 2
[Re: Diki]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5347
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
Hi Diki
Good to see you back posting again.
The problem with style protection is that if you do it then everybody starts’ moaning that it impedes there freedom to do with styles (That they have paid for) what they want.
In addition they moan when manufactures and 3rd parties do not produce many new styles, so whatever the manufacture does will always be wrong, (There dammed if they do and dammed if they don’t) personally I think protection is the best way.
As to American styles, then there are no American style produces, and so all American styles are produced in Europe or Japan, whereas if you look at Europe and Japan they have their own style production houses, so there is no shortage in style development. The only way Americans are going to get the styles they want is to follow Europe & Japan and produce them in their own country.
The fact that Americans are not prepared to produce their own work is the main reason why little notice is taken of them during arranger development, (These are the first threads in years that may actually be noticed) so come on you lot over the pond, get out and start developing. (You do it for Workstations and DAWs so there is no excuse)
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#344071 - 04/25/12 03:28 PM
Re: Yamaha Listens Part 2
[Re: YamahaUS1]
|
Member
Registered: 07/31/08
Posts: 570
Loc: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
|
I think that pretty much all that,s required has been covered, for me importantly, as you can see from Ketron users, we want either a professional keyboard for live use, or better a module you ca use with any midi control keyboard. Don't need touch screens iPad's have this hands down. 76 keys, lightweight, no inbuilt speakers, vst inclusion for sounds, styles and editing, but most importantly, bring the arranger into the mainstream. I mean thousands of muso's use arrangers for their living, so let's get those synth guys looking at it and saying "hey this is great" instead of mmm, well you know.a Styles we need a box that gives us the option of what we want, instead of what we get. Make the option of preload or connect and download. A fab live feel, I think sometimes we forget that a great 3 piece can be fabulous, not overdoing styles gives it a better live feel, once again some kind of vst arranger would be great. Allow all sa2,s to be used in duplicated ways, instead of the limitations placed as they are. Sounds like streaming from the Kronos wstation gigs of beautifull samples in real time, could go on for miles, but lastly agree that a sdk for programmers for styles should protect them, thus allowing many more varied and better style making.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|