|
|
|
|
|
|
#233553 - 05/02/08 07:50 AM
Re: The new Roland G is sooooo sexy
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/21/03
Posts: 3748
Loc: Motown
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233562 - 05/02/08 10:37 AM
Re: The new Roland G is sooooo sexy
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14194
Loc: NW Florida
|
I doubt (and hope!) that very little from the FantomG will make it to any mythical G80 arranger... Virtually NOTHING from the FantomX made it to the G70 other than the underlying engine (very fast response and 128 voices and a slight change in effects architecture) and some of the basic samples, including the superb Ultimate Grand, renamed GrandX. You have to understand that for all but the PA series, these arrangers are NOT based around their WS counterparts. There is next to nothing from the MotifES line in the Tyros2 other than samples, either... And, in all fairness, very little from the Oasys (other than engine and a few samples) and M3 in the PA2XPro. It is still based squarely around the Triton's architecture. The thing I think most Roland users are looking forward to is a RETURN to some tried and tested behaviors from the very successful G1000, along with the best in it's current OS, such as the Cover Tools, Makeup Tools and new OTS implementation. What are the touted features of the FantomG? An 8-track audio DAW, and some very intricate modeling of the Rhodes (and little else)... It's not exactly on my front burner of features to have! The sampler section is still (like ALL hardware samplers) too slow for practical arranger use. Possibly some of the loop-slice features might make it to the arranger division, but somehow I doubt it. Despite Ian's contention that the Yamaha's are the 'real' home keyboards, Roland's OS and feature set is FAR more geared for those that DON'T need to be encumbered by samplers, loop-slicers, and a plethora of 'pro' features that few home users will use. This of course is absurd, as they actually BUILD them for the 'pros', but leave out all the juicy stuff Yamaha waste on their 'home users' I'm sorry, but the FantomG is NOT sexy, at least in my eyes... It's your mother, dressed up in your teenage daughter's clothes!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233579 - 05/02/08 09:09 PM
Re: The new Roland G is sooooo sexy
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14194
Loc: NW Florida
|
Well, I went to Roland's site, listened to all the demos and watched the video... (and listened to Nielshs's demo)
I'm sorry, but I can't get worked up about this one at all. First of all, you know the thing they are touting the most? Glitchless patch changes... We've had that on Roland arrangers for years, including the G70. You occasionally get a glitch when an effect is changed (their main point, I guess) but with planning (what you have to do to get it on the FantomG as well, anyway!) you can avoid it, too. But basic tone change without the cutting off of the previous sound has LONG been the strong point of Roland arrangers...
Strike one...
Next... a 128 track internal DAW, with a mouse for control. Jeez, guys. C'mon! Anyone who needs a 128 track sequencer for audio/MIDI has already GOT one, with a great big honking monitor (not some little TFT 10" non-touch screen) and more plug-ins than you can shake a stick at...
Strike two!
And only TWO ARX slots (compared to SIX SRX slots on the FantomX) with only two boards available, both of which are dedicated to ONE SOUND EACH... So there goes your expandability....
Strike three... You're outta here!
Strangely, the audio examples of the main grand piano sounded very phase-y, kind of weird, but the video of it was VERY nice, but not THAT much better than the FantomX's main piano (in the G70, too). The new 88 action looks nice, but not to lug around!
And Nielshs's demo... sorry, but even with the 3-band compressor squeezing the E80 version a bit hard, it sounded better OOTB than the FantomG, IMO... I am sure with tweaking, and maybe the ARX drum board, it could be made to be better than the E80, but OOTB, sorry. Not very impressive.
If someone wanted to give me one of these, or a MotifXS, I'd probably pick the XS...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|