|
|
|
|
|
|
#181062 - 05/08/07 01:33 PM
Re: What made Technic's OS so good?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/16/02
Posts: 14376
Loc: East Greenwich RI USA
|
Diki, Perhaps your question would be better answered on the 'technics' page by players who have 'gotten into' their kbs more than I have, but... I have only owned 2 kbs - technics kn1000 and kn6000 ... I really have not played any others so I cannot comment on them, but as far as technics is concerned, I can only say that it is extremely user friendly, especially for finding/changing styles and voices ... many of the features that some other kb owners have wished for (based on conversations on S-Z) I have on the kn6000 ... I can change voices/volumes/pans/effects/etc. in a midi file 'on the fly' while playing that file, ... I can easily 'edit' an SMF while it resides in the kb and save my changes ... the kn6000 has a hard drive where I save SMFs registrations, etc. which can be 'edited' and saved with ease ... each style has 2 Intros and 2 endings and 4 variations at the pressing of a button ... I can 'Easy Record' a song, or parts of a song, and then through 'Realtime Recording' add other tracks as desired ... I can easily edit single notes in a song ... and on and on ... One feature the technics does not have, which I wish it did, is the ability to 'mark' an SMF to return to the beginning, or the bridge of the song ... I'm not saying technics is better than any of the others, but mine has served me well, and hopefully will continue to do so ...And it's a damned shame Matsu***** stopped manufacturing this board ... Hope this helps ... t.
_________________________
t.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#181063 - 05/08/07 02:27 PM
Re: What made Technic's OS so good?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6020
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi Diki, I think it ended up with sort of a cult following. I bought my first one back in 1988, then kept upgrading. I had the Kn800,kn2000,3000,5000 ,7000. I also owned the module version of the kn2000, & was probably the only person that bought the one & only Synthesizer they produced in the mid 90's ( model name escapes me at the moment W???)
They were a good solid keyboard, easy to use, sounded great. You didn't require a computer if you wanted to edit styles. They even came with their own Style Conversion disk so one didn't require EMC for a pc, you could do it in the KN itself. KN7000, I think they were he first ones to use a memory card ( sd). The Kn7 could actually be used as an audio soundcard . The pianist chord recognition was brilliant. Luved the styles. They just had very innovative ideas. It was the end of an era when they closed down. Update Actually forgot to mention my favourite function. The KN7 Pads. They actually stayed in sync no matter when you hit them. Psr pads do some sort of a catch up if you hit them at the wrong time. Technics were brilliant. 2 intruments per pad so you could have bass & piano rythm going or whatever you liked ,sort of a mini style if you added drums from one of the styles. Also pads 5 & 6 had a chord progression, so you could take a break & the pad would do a solo.
Dikki , wish you hadn't brought up this topic, memory lane is making me melancholy again ( haa haa) best wishes Rikki [QUOTE]Originally posted by Diki: [B]
[This message has been edited by rikkisbears (edited 05-08-2007).]
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#181081 - 05/09/07 05:17 AM
Re: What made Technic's OS so good?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/28/01
Posts: 2781
Loc: Lehigh Valley, Pa.
|
Technics -------------------------------------------- The Good: 1. Great Styles 2. Outstanding Organ Sounds. 3. The best vocal voices I've heard to date. 4. Real Audio SD Card System... Imagine playing your keyboard along side Frank Sinatra, and then saving that performance on your keyboard! ------------------------------------------- The Bad: 1. The default save from recording a song is a "Technics File", rather than the universal "Standard Midi File". Therefore, if you don't perform a lengthly conversion, you can't play your sequence on anything other than a compatible Technics keyboard. 2. Speaking of sharing, the default Technics File Is not backward compatible. Example: A KN-5000 could not play songs or styles that were made on a KN-6000. ------------------------------------------ and The Ugly: 1.The music stand on the KN-7000 seems like it's a block away. 2. The vocal harmonizer, or rather the lack of. 3. The sudden demise of Technics left owners up a creek. -------------------------------------------- Larry SynthZone Frapper [This message has been edited by lahawk (edited 05-09-2007).]
_________________________
Larry "Hawk" Hawk Music Sadly No More ♫ 🎹🎹 ♫ SX-900
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#181083 - 05/09/07 07:52 AM
Re: What made Technic's OS so good?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#181095 - 05/11/07 10:17 AM
Re: What made Technic's OS so good?
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14194
Loc: NW Florida
|
I completely agree. As I have said many times, these things are NOT our children. They are TOOLS... No more (or less) important than a good spade or a ratchet set! They should NOT be the cause of bitterness or even rudeness because someone holds a contrary opinion to you...
Admittedly, just saying 'I hate this or that' and leaving it at that seems hollow. We don't care IF you hate something. We want to know WHY. This is supposed to give us insight as to your 'method', show us why certain features either are of benefit, or why we might want to avoid them, you know, the exchange of information as well as just opinion. Opinion without reason is close to valueless.
Here's a quote from Donny(dnj): "Dont get me started... next to the XD9 which lasted 1hr, the 6000 was the second fastest one I dumped after playing it once on stage on one gig .......there were too many things to list here. Sorry for my honesty."
Here's opinion, but no reason... IMO, it would have been 'honest' if you HAD taken the time to list it. Otherwise, it's just your opinion. And that seems to change on a pretty steady basis, so what value does it have without reason?
My topic heading was 'WHAT made the Technic's OS so good'?. So far, there's about three or four posts that actually address the topic. If you HAVE an opinion about it, please state it WHILE you are addressing the 'actual' question.....
Please don't get mad at me (again!), I'm just trying to get this topic OFF the 'opinion wars', and back to the FACTS (or at least, opinion backed up by facts!)....
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#181100 - 05/12/07 01:56 AM
Re: What made Technic's OS so good?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/04/02
Posts: 4912
Loc: West Palm Beach, FL 33417
|
Spalding, you said, “It definitely positioned the instrument in my mind as being more suitable to the older market”, you are so right. Viewing the KN7000 keyboard from an older market I have found nothing to replace it.
I was preparing my PSR3000, setting up the registrations and the music finder, when I came to the song How do you keep the music playing I struggled to find what I wanted – After 20 minutes I went back to my KN7000 and played the song. I found what I was looking for, a rich clear sound, blending in the background bass and drums, beautiful vocals and strings.
I went back to programming my PSR3000, which can handle the music of today. Soon I will sell the PSR3000 and move into a Roland, Korg or a Kenton. The KN7 stays in my home, I have built a home cabinet for it. I find all the information and opinions about the new instruments valuable, what better place to get information.
IMHO, John C.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|