SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#160606 - 10/14/02 04:50 PM Re: PSR9000 Polyphony
DannyUK Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/09/99
Posts: 1130
I must admit that I got this alot when i had the PSR8000, but have never experienced it with my Korg, GEM or Solton kbs....

Top
#160607 - 10/14/02 06:12 PM Re: PSR9000 Polyphony
Ensnareyou Offline
Member

Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 491
Loc: California
There are several reasons why the PSR-9000 and 9000 Pro's polyphony can at times be problematic:

1. Many of the sounds on the 9K and 9K Pro are stacked with up to 4 layers. Dependent upon how many sounds are layered your polyphony could be cut by as much as four times. A four layer sound would give you around 32 notes of polyphony.

2. Some of the sounds on the 9000 and 9000 Pro are in fact not "true stereo" but mono sounds stacked then panned hard left and right to mimic stereo. This effectively reduces your polyphony in half. Use several of these "stereo" sounds in a song and chances are you will run out of polyphony very quickly.

3. Earlier versions of the 9K and 9K Pro had software bugs that caused unnatural sounding drop outs when excessive polyphony was used. Thankfully Version 2.0 and version 3.0 fixed most of these problems.

4. The 9K and 9K Pro had bugs in earlier software that also caused drop outs if an excessive number of sounds were used (even if the maximum polyphony wasn't exceeded). I'm not sure if the newest software Rev fixed these problems or not.

Yamaha, not unlike most manufacturers, hypes the number of voices and amount of polyphony as a selling feature but deliberately fails to mention the fact that their instruments can't truly produce 126 or 128 voices at once. Oh sure you could probably get close if you didn't stack the sounds but then the keyboard would sound like crap.

One case in point would be the Yamaha CVP-209. The CVP-209 is touted as having 256 notes of polyphony which is somewhat true. The CVP actually uses two sound engines, one for the piano and "Natural" sounds and one for all other sounds (Cool, Live, Sweet, etc.). Each processor has 128 notes of polyphony but that polyphony can't be shared amongst one another. If they could be shared it would be very difficult to run out of polyphony but anyone who's played a CVP-209 and held the sustain pedal down just to see what happens, will quickly realize the CVP can and will rob notes. The only way around this would be to design a newer, faster processor that could handle all 256 notes of DATA. This no doubt would raise the price of the already heavily inflated CVP series likely pricing it out of production.

When buying any synthesizer, keyboard, or arranger, buy it for what it will do at that time, not what it is supposed to do in a future software upgrade. Also, be certain that the unit can in fact do every function the manufacturer states because chances are it can't. Its called creative marketing and manufacturers know just how to word an ad so you want their new products.

Top
#160608 - 10/15/02 04:41 AM Re: PSR9000 Polyphony
technicsplayer Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/17/02
Posts: 3319
very true, ensnare

Top
#160609 - 10/15/02 02:38 PM Re: PSR9000 Polyphony
Mario Offline
Member

Registered: 07/07/99
Posts: 380
Loc: Wayside, New jersey, USA
The more I analyze the discussion on this thread, the more I realize what I am doing to contribute to the problem.
First, I am using layers with at least 50% of my leads.
Second, I am playing 4 note chords at least 75% of the time.
Thirdly, I am using Chordal Harmony at least 40% of the time.
I think, and this is just speculation on my part, the reason this problem exists in the PSR9K and not on the PSR2k is because the chip on the 2k may be faster. Maybe the PSR9000 is too slow to handle this many demands at once.
By the way the X1 occasionally "dropped out" under my style of playing, perhaps this contributes to the chordal harmony "bug" that only me seem to have experienced on this machine. Who knows?
Thanks guys for your contributions to this problem, which does not seem to have a solution at this time.
Mario

ps. Can't wait to try the Tyros under similar conditions.
_________________________
"Music should be heard, not felt. Protect your hearing"
Take a listen to some clips of my latest CD album. Thanks!
www.MarioLaVera.com

Top
#160610 - 10/16/02 07:48 AM Re: PSR9000 Polyphony
rgtaa Offline
Member

Registered: 10/08/01
Posts: 269
Mario!
I'm joking of course ... but just like some are in denial about Overeatting ... some are in denial about the "sustain pedal" ...

Unplug it ... and try it again ... or state " I don't use the sustain pedal" ... because I don't get hardly any dropped notes ... I would say none... but that wouldn't sound right ... none that I can remember ...

Now ..as I said before ...if I use the sustain pedal ...yes ... but that makes
sense to me ... right?

Now i would use the sustain pedal if I was switching to paino, drums and bass mode ... but NOT for FULL orchestra, or Band Mode ... because I realize that's eatting up poly super fast!
p.s. if the sustain pedal is disconnected ...and you still have cut offs ...I guess our style of playng are different!

p.s.s. is their settings in the prs9000 that allows you to say what you want to cut out first ? I forget?



[This message has been edited by rgtaa (edited 10-16-2002).]

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online