My apologies to Alfa, I was under the impression (can't remember where I started to think that) that he was part of the company. I was apparently VERY wrong, and apologize profusely..... Sorry, Alfa.

Fran, OTOH, posted a few weeks ago that he was involved with the company. That may have changed, I don't know. If it has, my apologies there, too.

--------------------------------------------------------

So, Richard, are you gigging with your MS? Or do you use primarily the VST side with other arrangers?

I can perhaps understand the reluctance to post any music done on the MS because of the scrutiny it will receive, but how, exactly, do you explain the poor quality of the official demos? It's fairly easy to download T2 and E80 mp3s from their manufacturers, and directly compare to demos from Domenik's site. No comparison, IMO...... Perhaps you can point me to a demo that DOES blow the competition away?

It is just of great concern to me, and many others here that have to listen to Domenik's constant crowing of superiority, that NO proof of it exists.

Most of us are probably aware that we could use a Receptor to provide a few VST sounds, and use a mature, mainstream arranger to achieve a very similar capability to the MS, with none of the problems that seem apparent in the factory demos. We 'get' it..... open systems COULD be very useful. But only if they works at least as well as the alternatives....

It is interesting to take a trip back in time through domenik's posts (gotta LOVE that search engine!) all the way back to 2003. He's still using the same lines - 'will sound better soon, after new update, blah, blah, blah'.....

Next year in Jerusalem, eh?