Hi Gary,
I have to agree with you whole heartedly on this one. Way back before arrangers, I used to look forward to playing with the band because it was fun and I didn't have to work as hard. But after arrangers came around, the game changed. For smaller bands, 3 or 4 pieces, There's just a whole lot more versatility and sound with a OMB. I can have as many as 8 parts on an arranger. If I go to a traditional trio, piano, bass, and drums, it works fine in jazz. But to play for dancing, it leaves a lot to be desired. These days when I absolutely have to have a group, I build it around the arranger by adding a guitar, sax, and trumpet. The music stays tight all night and even the musicians are happier.
Now there's still a lot to be said for an 8 piece show group, well rehearsed, and with lighting, ect., but they usually go for around $2,000. At this stage in my career, I don't need the hassle of keeping this type of group together when I can work as a OMB and make really good money and have lots of fun, and keep the dance floor full.
And as for the smoke filled rooms, I've had my fill of those as well. I've just recently turned down a couple of those gigs. I still play the Hyatt, but I just have to walk in, sit down, and play. No epuipment, no dancing, just nice piano music.
I'm sure this topic will generate heated discussion on both sides of the fence, this is just my humble opinion at age 55.
Salud,
Joe
------------------
Songman55
Joe Ayala
_________________________
PSR S950, PSR S900, Roland RD 700, Yamaha C3 6'Grand, Sennheiser E 935 mic, several recording mics including a Neuman U 87, Bose L1 Compact, Roland VS 2480 24 Track Recorder
Joe Ayala