A 5 Star Post Cath. I am not in defense of the Motif, or any gear. I use a Motif because of it's productivity ability. Being a music producer I need results on a timeline and the Motif IS good for that. You are right about XG and GS complimenting each other. I feel the same way. If I were to produce something that required 90 sound-types inserts on any device from whomever I can tell you right now that it would not be a very productive project. I can see how this would come in handy on an accumulating basis though. It would only save a simple proccess as loading a sound though, so I personally would not use that as a determining factor for the way I use the equipment to produce sounds. The Motif will directly link into a PC or MAC though to extend its ability of inserts on fly.

I believe the New V-Synth (when it comes to Roland, anyway) is more likely the intended competitive piece of gear. (It's not yet released though and supposedly packs a whollopping price tag from the trickle down I have heard (But it being a Roland, I'm sure that doesn't suprise us very much).

As far as polyphony goes, usually you would think that 64 note would be enough, and most times it is I'd say. Have you ever heard the difference in a patch that is straight and dry and one that is straight and dry with triple note layering with extremely subtle envelope changes on them? Try it. You will find the same sound to be extrodinarily better in quality. This is where polyphony can get gobbled up quickly, especially on orchestral parts when running more than 32 channels. You know what though, I wish I had an XV unit because I like the way they sound and operate. They for sure are way easier to tweak on...a lot less submenus. There are times I will hit a blank spot in my head, look down at the Motif's display and wonder where the hell am I. With a Roland, that's a lot less likely to happen.
Best to all in 2003!
MORPH!

[This message has been edited by Morphamatik (edited 01-02-2003).]