Thank you guys for your support.

I’ve been reinstalling Windows and all the software, so it took few days to make some new videos

These are some of EPiano voices:

SA EPiano - Roland Juno DS Voice Demo


Pure Wurly - Roland Juno DS Voice Demo


Vintage EP - Roland Juno DS Voice Demo


EP Bells - Roland Juno DS Voice Demo


After a week I can give a short review:

Comparing to PSR-s950 I got an impression that PSR doesn’t really have piano samples for soft touches (pianissimo). It imitates it with a filter. For this reason it’s hard to play PSR as a solo piano – your left-hand-background tends too much to be in a focus.

Juno’s piano sounds well with soft way of playing. It’s not perfect: one or two piano notes have samples which are a little bit “out of the picture” because of their different brightness. But I finally told myself that I should not expect it to be a perfect digital piano for this price.

I’ve been playing it all this week, mostly as a piano, and so far can’t get back to the PSR.

I expect that Yamaha MODX would be a much more powerful instrument; for example, a piano expansion for MODX is half a gigabyte, while for Juno DS it’s just 40 megabytes. But because of its price, MODX should be compared to Roland FA series, not Juno.

For some reason, manufacturers used to avoid 76 keys versions of keyboards: Yamaha had no such options for MO series, neither it had it for MOX, MOXF. Only TOTL Motif had this option. Finally, they came up with MODX 76; but in order to fight Juno, they have to make it based on MX series.

Juno DS, in my opinion, is primarily focused on pianos and e.pianos. It has some good orchestra sounds, nice pads, some synths. It’s not good when it comes to guitars or saxes. But I don’t see how you can play a saxophone voice with no styles.

As for arpeggiator, it looks like a pretty basic one.

The build quality is rather high. Everything, including keybed, looks and feels solid. Buttons are plastic, knobs, sliders and a dial wheel have some rubber coverage. Audio signal is clean, with no distortion or noise even at high volumes.

Audio can be recorded through USB cable (I did so in my videos).

There are some rhythms which you can launch with phrase pads, so far I didn’t find it useful, but I expect that over time I will find some useful things – after all, it’s rather sophisticated instrument with possibilities to adjust different parameters and add new content.

I intend to use it to the fullest, and not only at home.

Have a thought: it can work on batteries. Imagine, with popular nowadays portable speakers, you can perform with it anywhere with no electricity at all. Also, it has a microphone input with effects.

By the way, it has the same look as E-A7. I really want my next arranger to be some portable, so I’m looking forward to some PSR-S670 replacement, but who knows, maybe Roland will come up with something, too.

Meanwhile, I’m doing okay with no styles at all, but it can be just a phase.

Some additional observations about Juno DS:

Transpose takes to buttons to adjust, unless you just the transpose it on and off.
But there’s something like “master transpose” in settings, so you can use this “on and off” methods for the two values you need.

76 keys are better than 61. But you can easily run out of it as well. After I try to put it in my car I may change my mind.

After playing PSR for years, it’s not easy to switch even to this “lightweight” keybed. The point is - any adjustment takes time.

I used to think that giving 76 keys to a PSR would be a perfect solution. Now I think that PSR has a piano voice which is suitable mostly for playing with styles; so keyboard is just a half of a problem.

In general, PSR feels like a more finished product than Juno DS: all of tones are polished and usable straight away. But that can we a weakness, too. Juno’s samples are not so “sterilized”, and you get more of a “piano character”.

So far I have a feeling that I got what I needed, rather than what I wanted. I wanted, certainly, a Genos, but this way I still have my car :-) Actually, had no chance even to try it, stores at Moscow do not seem eager to display it.