Originally Posted By: leeboy
rosetree,
Yes I like the M3 exp sounds very much. I had a PA2XPRO and many sounds suffered from poor sampling/programming.
Example...you play a nice Sax solo, and some notes now & then have a honk sound instead of the same sound as the others...and sometimes vibrato varies so much note-note that it sounds horrible. [...]
The thing is...talking Pianos or any thing...these high end company's know how to do terrific sounds...and they have them ...they sometimes only use older samples or are afraid to put in their best sounds into an arranger because the PRO division does not want the arrangers to sound as good


Yes, obviously there is a considerably split in sample quality between different Korg instruments (maybe arrangers versus high-end synthesizers) and also between presets versus expansions. Those M3 expansions were taken from the OASYS, which had a 7,000� price tag... In these spheres, it is also insiginificant whether a sample is from 2014 or from 2005, even a sample from the late 1990s can be superior if it was produced thoroughly and with enough megabytes of data.
As you say, there is a problem if vibrato is sampled and there are not enough samples per octave. The vibrato speed varies terribly then. On the other hand, no artificial (edited) LFO vibrato can get as realistic as a sampled one. I hate edited vibrato, you immediately hear that it is not from a real instrument. So one would have to have samples for every single key, and obviously Korg didn't want to spend that much waveROM for saxophones in the PA2X.

Funnily, in the case of Yamaha it is partly vice versa: a lot of the Tyros voices are not part of the pro synthesizer Motif: it doesn't have SA2 voices. But as I said, on the other hand, the Tyros doesn't have the higher-quality pianos the Motif can load into its flash board.