Originally Posted By: Fran Carango
Originally Posted By: miden
I wasn't getting in your face tbh, merely expressing incredulity at your statement - no face-getting there - and the comments I referenced are directly yours re live-sound, NOT Dikis...re-read your post...

Differing opinion is fine....I have no probs with that, do you? Seems you might if based on your many responses over the years whenever someone writes a contrary view about Rolands to the one you hold...

Mebbe not......but that's how it seems...





Dennis , let me clarify again,,,the initial post is 100 percent Diki..I did not utter one word...followed by your comments...so you are totally wrong...again smile


No re-READ your post and the bit I quoted...THAT is your personal comment...

I mean which part of this is not yours...even the IMO!!!

That litany of great arranger features above that Roland do not have is balanced by the fact that NONE of them (IMO) have anything NEAR as live a sound as the Roland's do.

And THAT'S what I was commenting on (that specific line as clearly indicated in my op) so perhaps it is YOU who is wrong again...