17 to 14 (at the point I write this) is hardly an overwhelming ratio for either side of the 76/61 debate.

But it proves nothing (other than only 31 people at this forum of hundreds are even bothered to vote).

To be honest, Scott, the only poll that would be of any serious use would be a poll where we are asked to write down five things that AREN'T on any current arranger, along with the cost those features are on other keyboards or studio hardware. Then someone would have to tally them all up, group together the similarities, and average out the estimated cost of inclusion.

It's all well and good to dream, but you have to be practical and pretend that COST actually IS a factor. You could take the world's best WS, and marry it to the world's best arranger, but what you end up with is something that would cost close to what BOTH of those would cost separately.

It's good to dream, but it also good to know WHEN you are dreaming...