Touch screens are only as good as the UI written for them. My G70's screen is utterly reliable when pressing areas large enough to BE reliable.

However, there are a couple of functions that suffer from either being in the wrong place (octave transpose up and down areas are in the middle of several other things, a little harder to hit precisely when you are in a rush), or too small (the button for Fill/Rit is a bit small, despite being in a large blank area all by itself).

But none of these are the fault of the touch screen itself. It's is dependable, easy to read (MUCH better than MoXS screens - tiny fonts in many areas, there) and well laid out with a couple of exceptions. Despite the rush you are in when playing pretty busy with both hands, I rarely EVER get anything other than what I want from it.

Given that a touch screen can present FAR more needed functions on one screen than a non-touch surrounded by just a few buttons, and that issue means that much needed functions are often on different pages rather than all in one place, I think the touch screen is the better solution.

They have MUCH improved since the early days (think original Triton!) and I think it's time they were universally adopted...

Just make sure any problems you have with them aren't more to do with the User Interface layout, rather than the underlying technology...