Just asking.
It seems as if when Yamaha releases a new arranger, some persons swear that it is perfect and Yamaha does not and can not do anything to improve it. They would say that the styles and sounds are perfect and nothing needs to be done to improve on the keyboard.

Are they lying? Are they brainwashed? Are they biased?
Just asking.

When the T2 came out, it was the best and no improvements needed to be made. But then the T3 comes out then they say it sounds better than the T2. How can that be.

When the new arranger comes out, not only do they say it sounds good but they actually dump the old one and spend money to get the new one.


Same thing with the S900.
Now the S 910 is out they say it is better than the S 900. But sound and style wise, when the S 900 came out no improvements needed to be made.
How can that be.

Just asking.



[This message has been edited by to the genesys (edited 10-06-2009).]