I can state only one thing and i think i have enough experience in all this synths that you
mentioned above...G70 dont have even 70% of the abilities of what PA2X offers...YAMAHA not worth
to mention at all, Audya...i am about to cry, MS is same thing, take into consideration everything,
not just how open it is but many other factors as time, easy of use and else. Synths like PA series,
PSR series, the G series, Ketron SD series, Motif series and Triton series is machines that i own or
owned and each one i know by heart to the last parameter, the only machines that i can compare
the PA2Xpro in SOUND EDIT COMPLEXITY is MOTIF, TRITON or FANTOM, nothing else.
Lets be real, Ketron doesnt even have FX onboard...yes they do but they dont even affect the sound
at all, its funny, YAMAHA...everything has to be done thru stupid XG while Korg, everything and
anything you do with a software is all possible on the synth. I dont wanna get into details but since
i know all these machine i can sit down and write a full comparison on all of them by point.
If really read the PA2X manual he will understan...and half of it probably is not even there...
_________________________
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.