Originally posted by cgiles:
I've said it before and I'll say it again. The differences between players is going to be much more significant than the differences between these two instruments. Also, the C1 is trying to to simulate the sound of a B3; The B3 isn't trying to simulate the sound of anything. How often does one compare a fake Rembrandt to the original. The original is going to 'win' every time.
My point is, aside from being completely subjective, these comparisons have little value (for deciding a purchase) unless other clones are included. The B3 should be the benchmark as we compare the clones for authenticity of sound, weight, cost, portability, aesthetics, and any other qualities that need to be considered for your personal requirements.
Also, remember that you're comparing a clone with built in sim, to a B3 AND Leslie. Do the comparison with the B3 plugged into one of the old PR20/40 Hammond cabinets and then see which sound you prefer.
And for those who feel a need to cover the Animals or any other Vox/Farfisa classics, try that on your '65 B3.
And again, let's not forget the importance of the player. Put me on a B3 w/Leslie and Joey D. or Tony Monaco on the C1 and , trust me, in a blindfold test, you'll pick the C1
. Like I said in a previous post, if you're not an organ player, it's not going to make two cents worth of difference (hint - save your money.....and your back).
chasI do agree with you chas, and there's a good reason I have a VR 760, no problem to clone the vox/farfisa's/rhodes etc...

Fred
_________________________
Keyboards/Sound Units: Kurzweil 2600S, Roland VR-760, Acces Virus C, Roland G-800, Akai AX60, Minimoog, Machine Drum, Roland R8-M, mediastation x-76