Spalding and Rikkis,

Now that I've read a few more of the posts on this thread, I can hear where you're coming from. Quite frankly I thought that this was a regular Korg Sax drenched in effects to make it usable. I didn't realize that this was a creation by a Korg user. Obviously in that case its not fair to compare.

Unfortunately the original post made none of this clear.

PS: Btw, even taking into account that I was "criticizing" how he drenched the sax in effects, my criticism wasn't of the user, it was of Korg that made a sax that only sounded good when drenched in effects. When I wrote "... how desparate the user was to make the Korg sax sound good" and that he has "something to hide..." that's what I had in mind, although in retrospect it was a very poor choice of words.

Trust me, I'm the last person on this planet to judge another person or another person's work. When it comes to professional companies and businesses whom I pay for a product however, I do expect the best bang for my buck.

Apologies if I offended the Korg user.
Chony

[This message has been edited by chony (edited 03-23-2008).]