Ian, my quote was true
" I thought it would be interesting to post our feelings of the Arranger keyboards we each owned...
Casio MZ2000,,First impression was okay, but did not like overall.. "

Coming from my preference Roland products, I decided to use my Roland E-600 instead of the MZ, for smaller jobs..They are similar..speakers , mic with effects,drawbar organ, floppy disk, sequence playback, good to great sounds, and the E-600 had a vocal harmonizer...I had the same money in each of them..So I decided to use the E-600..After I got back the MZ2000, and no longer have the E-600..I played around in more detail and found some features I really liked[stereo inputs, by passable/ and with effects...The edit ability of sounds, and the flexibility of the drawbar organs/effects..]..It fills my need for the purposes I had in mind NOW..

Ian , I do not see any similarity MZ to the KN5000/KN6000..

Can you enlighten me?

All of the features of the MZ can be found in prior Casio lines..

The KN used the horrible composite memory system that wasted a lot of memory..If they improved this with[supposibly] design of the MZ...why would they revert back to the same system with their own KN6500 and KN7000?

Sorry, you can't convince me yet...Give me what you got!!