Yeah I bet he thought that by doing that he'd avoid and legal action, but I'm sure he learned a lesson on this one.. He should have just said nothing about it at all.. You know that makes me wonder.. If this is applicable over there and it's copyrighted, what if someone here in the US decides to write a song and has a one minute pause in it, but doesn't credit cage for it..? Are they going to get sued for it??? One would think the copy right issue can be applied just the same here in the US.... It's not really the pause that's copy righted but the concept of a performance that constitutes silence within the composition.. So basically everyone is in violation of that copy right.. Hell just by composing a song on our arrangers and pressing the "break" button is a good example.. If we mass market the composition (say worldwide) that copyright issue technically could apply because of the legal loop hole based on the "concept" Also keep in mind the catch word here is "concept" You can't actually copyright silence, but the concept yes... Again it's a crappy way to sue someone, but hey some people do anything for money and there is always a attorny that's willing to take it on....

Squeak