That's a valuable lesson for us all. But can't we still hate 'em for being so good, so young? How'd they get so good so quickly? Could it be that they were out practicing scales while we were out practicing licks (to impress girls and bar patrons). Could it be that they're just flat-out more talented? Nah. The secret, I'm sure, is the amount and level of classical training. There are some who believe that too much training kills creativity and "soul". What a bunch of horse hockey that is. Training, technique, and mastery of one's instrument, only allows you the freedom (and tools) to express that creativity. Believe me, the ones who excel in this business without the training are the exceptions, not the rule.

I also think (and this will come under fire) that the best and most accomplished musicians are to be found in the jazz ranks. Not the most successful, the most accomplished. I'll bet that if you asked every guy in the Tonight Show band or Letterman's (Paul Schaefer), they'd describe themselves as jazz musicians, with few, if any, describing themselves as rock, pop, blues, or country musicians. If you don't think this is true, stick a chart in front of a musician from any of the other genres' and listen to the deafining silence.

What makes a fine, successful musician? Three things; talent, drive, and training. So if you've got the drive and the training and still can't catch a break, even here on SZ, here's a clue; it's the TALENT, dummy.

chas