Hi Frank
wrong term, it is dual, I haven't been able to get it below 512 and strangely as I mentioned previously, in forte, I get a better result with the wdm driver than with ASIO4All.
In BIAB , I end up with a 23ms latency using asio4all, and far worse than that, with the windows driver.
Something doesn't quite seem right. Fortunately I don't have latency problems when I load the soundfonts into the defacto audigy software.and it plays them back really well.
Maybe I should do some checking up on dual processors ?? not quite sure where to start?
Maybe I could have the best of both worlds,
2 controllers, 2 laptops, one running melody
instruments, the other, soundfonts & omb. The mind boggles haa haa, hubby will have me committed shortly.
best wishes
Rikki
Originally posted by Frank L. Rosenthal:
Any setting of 441 or less should be good, i.e., 10ms or less. This is good for any instrument including a 'naked piano'. A setting of 441 should not be to hard on a CPU. I run mine at 128 (3ms) with no problems.
Rikki one would think a new laptop should easily beable to achieve good results with a setting of 441 samples per channel or less. When you say your laptop is a duo do you mean a dual processor. If so most software is not able to take advantage of this and may even react badly to it....especialy host and sampler software. You should beable to turn this feature off including hyper threading.
Previous Topic
Index
