Originally posted by cgiles:
Lucky: "I’m interested to see if anyone else sees it as I do?" Chas: “I don't. Everything seems to be about how YOU see it, how YOU prefer things to be, what YOU want SZ to be about; in other words, YOU, YOU, YOU. The world in general and SZ in particular, has no obligation to conform to what YOU want.”
chas
Chas.....
I just now read this.
Now, what I'm interested about is how you arrived at that conclusion?
Perhaps you skipped over the previous line which reads:
"For those of you who are going to argue my point...this is MY opinion. I’m not saying this is the way it should be, but that this is the way I would prefer it to be."
You write: "Everything seems to be about how YOU see it"
Me: “much of what I write IS about how I see it...no different than anyone else in this room.”
You write: "how YOU prefer things to be"
Me: "absolutely correct...I was never a follower. I think a lot and I express my views a lot. Again....no different from anyone else in this room."
You write "what YOU want SZ to be about"
Me: "May I ask what is wrong with that?"
You write: "in other words, YOU, YOU, YOU. The world in general and SZ in particular, has no obligation to conform to what YOU want."
Me: "If you look at my postings, I don't believe I ever demanded that the SZ "conform to what I want." If YOU feel it does, then I'll have to be more careful about how I "word" my postings from now on."
In real life, I'm actually a very open-minded individual who enjoys viewing and debating an issue and hearing the viewpoints of others (the qualifier being when they're not laced with hostility!).
Lucky