Trinity and Triton

Also somewhat off topic...

Anyone knows the difference between Trinity and Triton?

------------------
New Yorker

Well I the Triton has more poly.. The Trinity was only 32 voice... The Triton is supposed to have better sounds, but I find a lot of people who upgraded to the Triton disagree.. The Triton's touch screen is also faster in response time as well. I personally think the Trinity looks much better than the Triton.. The trinity was way more sleek, and the Triton was just boxy as hell. I believe voice structure and expansion options differ as well.. Have you gone to Korgs site and looked at both models?

Squeak

[This message has been edited by squeak_D (edited 09-20-2002).]

No I haven't. Triton and Trinoty one of those boards when you wanna ask an opinion of the one who dealt with them. On your own in the store you need a few hours to figure them out. I just wonder if anyone knows the real difference between them. I dont think Korg would do same boards based just on look and poly...

In my opininon. I think the ACCESS engine in the trinity is better than the HI in teh Triton/Triton studio/karma. even though the HI engine is way more complicated than the Access.

Well from friends who have had both of these keyboards, the exact responses from a couple of them were the same.....for a live instrument, the triton kicks major behind (which, by watching all major concerts, you see that most keyboarders have this in their setup). Thats with the combi's, effects, etc.
The Trinity has better, more usable sounds for the studio.

How about features and sequencer? Are they the same?